After Waltz added a journalist to a top-secret group discussion of management strategies against the Houthis, President Donald Trump has reiterated his support for national surveillance director administration”>Mike Waltz.
In an exam, Trump claimed that” Michael Waltz has learned a lesson, and he’s a fine man.”
Trump continued, adding that Goldberg’s participation in the conversation had no impact on the “perfectly powerful” harm and that he wasn’t bothered by how much the “glitch” was getting.
The only issue in two decades, according to Trump, turned out to be one that wasn’t significant.
Waltz added Jeffrey Goldberg, the editor-in-chief of the , Atlantic, and  , to a Signal conversation with almost 20 senior management representatives in one of the following Trump administration’s first big crises. Goldberg witnessed the party discuss contentious issues involving U.S. plans to attack the Yemeni-based Houthis. Trump was urged to fire his national security adviser as soon as the media broke.
A senior administration official told Politico,” Half of them say he’s never going to live or don’t live.” Two senior White House aides think Waltz may be fired to stop Trump from being placed in a “bad place.”
The National Security Advisor would face few, if any, consequences according to the Washington Examiner, who spoke with more than a few top management figures and Trumpworld operatives.
Two senior administration figures stated in a statement that Waltz would continue to serve as national security adviser, with one adding that the “uproar” the Trump opposition was “making the president [want ] to close ranks.”
The second established continued,” The president has seen more scandals created by the false news than he has good share of.” This may blow through,” the saying goes. They do it often.
However, one Democratic strategist with close ties to the White House suggested that Waltz might turn out to be a” ritual lamb.” If GOP legislators begin voicing more censure of the violation, noting that CIA Director John Ratcliffe and Director of National Intelligence Tulsi Gabbard are scheduled to testify before the parliamentary knowledge boards this year.
In a statement that took a chance at Goldberg and the Atlantic, White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt also defended Waltz.  ,
” Jeffrey Goldberg is well-known for his alarmist spin. Here are the details of his most recent account, she posted. “1. No “war programs” were discussed. 2. No confidential information was provided for the string. 3. The White House Counsel’s Office has provided instructions on a number of different websites to President Trump’s leading authorities in order to converse as safely and effectively as possible.
Other Republicans and administration figures are also veering away from Waltz in the press.
Waltz should “absolutely not” resign, according to House Speaker Mike Johnson (R-LA ), who stated that he had “full confidence in him.”
When asked, Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth downplayed the situation, calling Goldberg a “deceitful and highly discredited, so-called journalist who’s made a profession of peddling hoaxes repeatedly,” one of those in the chat who allegedly shared classified information through the unsecured app.
No one was texting war plans, he said, and that’s all I have to say in relation to that.
Goldberg claimed that was a lie and that detailed war plans were discussed, but he made a decision to refrain from publishing the specifics out of concern for American service members.
On Monday, National Security Council spokesman Brian Hughes confirmed the leak’s truth. This appears to be an authentic message chain, and we are looking into how an unintentional number was added to the chain, he told the , Washington , Examiner.
JEFFREY GOLDBERG GUESSES HEGSETH LIED IN DISMISSING INTELLIGENCE LEAK
Vice President , JD Vance, Marco Rubio, Ratcliffe, and Gabbard were all present during the discussion.
Congress has been vocal about the incident, with Democrats calling for a swift congressional investigation.
