On Tuesday, the Senate confirmed Dr. Jay Bhattacharya as chairman of the National Institutes of Health, a victory for truthful technology versus crooked, distorted pseudo-science at the national level.
Advertisement
The NIH’s policies against COVID-19 lockdowns and other government measures under past leadership were fatal, which is why Francis Collins and Anthony Fauci, two top NIH officials, were so eager to censor free speech that related to their abhorrent policies. According to the Twitter Files, Bhattacharya was one of the goals of tech-government repression collaboration during lockdowns. However, now that the situation has changed and the Trump administration has appointed the restricted doctor as head of NIH, the organization should ideally not more prioritize authoritarian government control over the scientific method.
” Great media”! Robert Malone, an engineer and doctors, applauded Bhattacharya’s confirmation. Vinay Prasad, a physician-scientist, praised Bhattacharya as” obviously qualified and the best candidate.” How does 47 thinking people vote against a confirmed intellectual and a Stanford teacher, asks cardiology professor John Mandrola, who criticized Senate Democrats for supporting Bhattacharya. Science ought to be non-political. Come in, everyone.
No Democrat voted in favor of Dr. Bhattacharya’s confirmation as the NIH’s producer now. The democrat party’s dysfunction has gotten to the point where they are no longer able to cast votes on qualifications simply along party lines. Shame on them. @DrJBhattacharya
— Robert W Malone, MD ( @RWMaloneMD) Mar 24, 2025
Advertisement
A New NIH Sheriff is in Town, please!
Mike Davis, a lawyer and mind of the Article III Project, stressed Bhattacharya’s endorsement of Truth Social. This is fantastic reports. Dr. Jay Bhattacharya received vilification from the Covidians for doing what they were supposed to do every day [sic]: subject the technology. The medical approach follows that.
Except if you’re more concerned about using taxpayer money and attacking government authority, like past NIH officials, especially under Biden. Davis emphasized the value of scientists who are passionate about conducting goal research, citing this as a result of medical advancement and human development. And Bhattacharya was correct, and the Covidians were utterly mistaken. How many people, especially the vulnerable, were excessively subject to COVID lockdowns, 6-foot social distancing, and other thoughtless and cruel measures?
More than one review came to the conclusion that lockdowns claimed much more lives than they saved. How many children, especially poor black children, have experienced learning loss, misuse, and abuse? Davis continued. How some older people, especially the elderly, perished by themselves? How many Americans, especially conservatives, were censored, debuffed, deplatformed, and fired for bringing up The Science ( this madness )? Justice may reform NIH and hold those responsible for the organization’s power and money-fraud responsible. Jay will restore technology to its former glory
Advertisement
To help preconceived and despotic government policies, the federal government should not be involved in medical at all. At the very least, it should emphasize quality research over propaganda. Bhattacharya has a significant job back of him in the NIH reform process.
Do you like PJ Media’s liberal reporting on the woke media and the extreme left? To keep bringing you the fact, please help our work. Use the discount code Duel to save 60 % on your Club membership when you sign up for PJ Media VIP!  ,
