The followers of Jesus Christ clashed with Satan’s prisoners last week in Topeka, Kansas, and Christ triumphed. A relatively unknown organization called the Satanic Grotto attempted to hold a” Black Mass” outside the Kansas State Capitol, which was met by dozens of Catholic protesters who had no desire to stand by and watch the evil party go on in harmony.
These Catholics were right to say that we shouldn’t bear insults and sacrileges against the Christian beliefs because we can’t handle them because they don’t understand the meaning of religious liberty. Freedom of religion in America should never have been interpreted so widely as to permit Religion to conduct a Black Mass on the actions of a state senate, or anywhere else, relative to how the United States Supreme Court began to re-interpret the First Amendment in the middle of the 20th centuries.
First of all, it’s important to know that a Black Mass mocks and inverts the Catholic Mass for demon functions. Black Masses have been a tradition for generations, and they were once conducted in technique because the Catholic Church and liberal government opposed them. Satanists may take a sacred Eucharistic host in order to execute one, which they then desecrate in an action of anger toward God. Catholic parishes keep the sacred host in a locked temple for this reason, and Catholic clergy do not permit parishioners to transport the number with them up to their chairs during Holy Communion.
Christians and Religion both believe that the bread and wine used in Holy Communion are the real body and blood of Christ, when consecrated. For a Black Mass, Religion will only use a network that has been consecrated by a Catholic preacher.
In order to retrieve the consecrated network the Religion claimed to have secured, Archbishop Joseph F. Naumann of Kansas City, Kan., knew this. The judge rejected the case because The Satanic Grotto swore in judge that it didn’t have a sacred network.
The Catholic honest didn’t just put their hands away and let the devil-worshippers do as they pleased because they had failed to stop the Black Mass in jury. The Satanic Grotto was met by dozens of quiet Catholic demonstrators who had prayed for them in four different Topeka parishes to celebrate their recompense Masses that day.
The Religion began their Black Mass on the actions of the Kansas Capitol while jeering at the large masses of singing and praying Christians. A Christian man named Randy Blasi rushed forward and leaped on the host before the time came when Michael Stewart, the creator and leader of the Satanic Grotto, allegedly to trample on it. The Satanists attacked Blasi on the head and neck, but it was too soon because their sin had been stopped.
The Satan-haters, however, were not at all ready to give up, so they entered the senate and hoped to have their meeting finished. A , a widely circulated video clip, shows Stewart holding up a backpack containing what appeared to be another sacred network. A young man by the name of Marcus Schroeder grabbed the bag and wouldn’t let go before he could finish his profane incantations. Schroeder was knocked down by Stewart after being punched in the face half. Stewart yelled “hail Satan” as authorities detained him and immediately took him to restraints. Along with at least two of his supporters, he was later charged with disorderly conduct and unlawful assembly. Marcus was even accused of chaotic do.
Stewart and his colleague Religion claimed that they were merely exercising their First Amendment right both before and after the events at the congress. Technically correct, but only because the Supreme Court abandoned First Amendment law in the 1950s, which had been enforced in every condition since the founding of our country.
Ironically, the state of New York’s decision to outlaw an anti-Catholic movie called” The Miracle” on the grounds that it was” sacrilegious” had a bearing on the case. In Joseph Burstyn, Inc. v. Wilson, the Supreme Court ruled in 1952 that the restrictions on free speech in New York legislation that allowed the film’s prohibition were “restraint on completely speech” and were in violation of the First Amendment.
The Supreme Court’s majority decision overturned a landmark decision from 1915 that stated that the First Amendment’s free speech protections do not apply to movies because” they may be used for evil” and that film censorship is no “beyond the power of the government.” In its 9-0 decision, the judge ruled that the film exhibition was not to be viewed” as a part of the country’s press or as an outlet for people opinion.” The court argued that just as the government can manage the theater or circus through licensure, but can it manage the way movies are shown.
It’s difficult to imagine that there was ever completely conversation in this land before 1952 because of how far we have come from that past knowledge of the First Amendment, which endured from its approval in 1791 until the middle of the last decade. But we succeeded. A Satanic Black Mass may be regarded as a legitimate expression of free speech or the free exercise of religion because what we had, didn’t had, was a public square that was so perverted and devoid of any goal social standards.  ,
We’re asked to handle this kind of sacrilege in public immediately, something that not even one of our founding fathers did had done. It is absurd to think that any of them or any of their successors may have supported a Black Mass, or any other public Satanic ceremony on the grounds that it was legitimate statement or a legitimate practice of religion for a decade or more.
We don’t have to put up with it because we like them. You may file your case in court, as these brave Christians demonstrated last year. If that isn’t enough, you can file a quiet, peaceful protest. And if it does, you may reject the blasphemy and sacrilege of the Satanists by enduring their blows and standing up for what is sacred, and showing the world the generosity and devotion that true faith inspires.
