Image Credits FDRLST/Canva
On Tuesday, the U.S. Supreme Court heard arguments to decide whether claims have a right to refuse to pay Medicaid costs to baby-killing companies.
In Medina v. Planned Parenthood South Atlantic, SCOTUS will decide whether South Carolina is entitled to get Planned Parenthood unsuitable for Medicaid money because of its fascination with pregnancy.
At the South Carolina governor Under the direction of Henry McMaster, the position sought to shift Medicaid money that would ordinarily go into Planned Parenthood’s pockets to organizations that concentrate on providing better, more complete care rather than ending lives. Planned Parenthood vigorously opposed this restriction on the movement of federal tax money, which undoubtedly contributes to its continued existence, and filed a lawsuit to prevent it.
According to John Bursch, top lawyers and vice president of administrative advocacy at Alliance Defending Freedom, South Carolina” may be free” to recognize the majority of Americans ‘ opposition to taxpayer-funded pregnancies and be careful about who receives taxpayer-funded money.
Before the arguments started, Bursch said in a statement that “taxpayer dollars should never be used to finance facilities that profit from abortion and disseminate harmful gender-transition drugs to minors. ” State authorities should be free to establish that Planned Parenthood, a multi-billion-dollar activist group, is not a legitimate medical provider and is not qualified to receive Medicaid funding from the government.”
Sonia Sotomayor, Elena Kagan, and Ketanji Brown Jackson, three of the Democratic-nominated justices, attempted to turn the rights debate on its head by arguing that abortion companies like Planned Parenthood are more than qualified to receive money if a Medicaid recipient chooses the abortion industry’s leader as her supplier.
The attorney for Planned Parenthood South Atlantic, Nicole Saharsky, also made an effort to refute the claim that her client’s claims of “individual respect and personal economy” for Medicaid recipients are meant to provide them” the same thing that people with private insurance enjoy.”
However, according to Bursch, the Palmetto State should have the authority to appoint the organization that determines the doctors who are members of the network, similar to how a personal insurance company determines who can access abortion gizmos as a protected option for Medicaid patients.
There are many great reasons why states does not fund Planned Parenthood. The biggest abortion industry in the country has a story of , reportedly feigning national law , and , wasting tax money, dispensing systems drugs , to confused adolescents, reportedly , trafficking baby , system parts,  , enabling abusers, allegedly , reportedly performing unlicensed&nb
The 18 says, the federal government, many members of Congress, South Carolina’s medical professionals, and pro-life activists who all  submitted friend-of-the-court briefs found help for South Carolina’s claim that it denied Planned Parenthood’s request for payer funding.
Congress did not intend for federal judges to second-guess states ‘ decisions regarding which companies are eligible for Medicaid funding, according to Bursch in a statement. We ask that the Supreme Court reaffirm its authority to use minimal public assets to best serve its members.
The Federalist team author and host of The Federalist Radio Hour, Jordan Boyd. Her function has also been published in RealClearPolitics, Fox News, and The Daily Wire. Jordanian received her bachelor’s degree from Baylor University, where she majored in social science and minored in media. Following her on X @jordanboydtx.
