President Trump was denied by the Supreme Court on Tuesday, putting an end to one of his most significant goes to drain the swamp, which the court effectively blocked. The Court obtained a lower court purchase that would have forced the government to rejoin hundreds of national employees as a result of Trump’s violent efforts to reduce the bureaucracy’s size.  ,
Advertisement
The justices acted in the government’s emergency elegance of a national judge’s ruling ordering that 16, 000 temporary employees been reinstated while a lawsuit is being filed because their firings didn’t comply with federal law, according to the Associated Press. Employees in six national agencies will continue receiving paid administrative leave as a result of the high judge’s ruling.
The two dissenters in this case, as you might have guessed, were Justices Sonia Sotomayor and Ketanji Brown Jackson. But, for the time being, the mass shootings continue, and the deep position is reeling.
In a less than a week, the Supreme Court has supported President Trump in his fight against activist judges who are attempting to stall his plan with this decision. The justices have also stayed a decision that would have reinstated deportations and overturned another that had used a long-standing military legislation to prevent deportations in recent days.
CNN made no attempt to conceal its disapproval of the decision, as CNN’s chief legal interests journalist Paula Reid and anchor Dana Bash both expressed their condolences in thin shrouded language when they heard the news.
Anchor Dana Bash opened the sector, notably less enthusiastically than the anchor.” We start, nevertheless, with breaking information at the Supreme Court. It also gave President Trump another victory, allowing his leadership to fire hundreds of national employees on probation.
Advertisement
While acknowledging the importance of the decision, CNN’s Paula Reid emphasized its legal nature, giving the impression that it underplayed its larger implications. She acknowledged that this was a major victory for the management and that it was” the fourth award the Supreme Court has received in recent days.” However, Reid immediately changed to make the suggestion that it’s” sort of a specialized win,” making an implication about legal standing rather than the actual firings.
Reid stated that” this choice will allow the government to maintain those individuals off the payment while the larger issues surrounding these firings are being litigated.” According to Reid,” The nine nonprofit agencies did not possess standing in this case.”
Following Trump’s taxes, nations are starting to negotiate trade agreements.
Reid acknowledged that the Trump administration had been eagerly awaiting some comfort from the judges despite her attempt to limit the impact of the decision. She said,” The Justice Department and the Trump presidency have been waiting for a while for great information from the authorities after a string of losses.” ” And they have been receiving a lot of positive reports from the great court over the past few time.”
SCOTUS simply ruled in Trump’s pursuit once more, Bursting!
They objected to a lower court’s decision that mandated the presidency rejoin 16, 000 governmental employees.
HUGE WIN!!! photograph. twitter.com/qPWzU0IgTL
— Gunther Eagleman™ ( @GuntherEagleman ) April 8, 2025
Advertisement
The Supreme Court is reining in the judicial advocacy of extreme lower court judges, despite CNN’s attempts to minimize the victory as legal.
The Supreme Court’s victory over Trump was on Monday night when it overturned Judge Boasberg’s decision to evict aggressive Tren de Aragua gang members. The activist court, which has been relentlessly trying to shop his emigration mission, has been dealt a major blow.
The actual surprise came from Justice Amy Coney Barrett, who joined them in dissention as the three common offenders on the bench, Sotomayor, Kagan, and Jackson, as expected. Barrett’s decision raises serious questions about her dependability when it comes to defending professional authority, as my PJ Media partner Sarah Anderson pointed out.
Want a censored view of Trump’s assault on the Strong State? Get access to our brave reporting, insider updates, and special analysis. Use the script Battle to save 60 % off today to become a PJ Media VIP and help us keep disclosing the truth about the administrative resistance. We’re winning, as this success on the Supreme Court shows, but we need patriots like you to maintain the momentum.
