Anyone who is unsure about Secretary of State Cisco Aguilar’s new act, AB 534, removes any doubts.
Citizens can challenge the registration of a voting who has moved from the place of their home by using the” Part 535″ and” Part 547″ in two ways.
Our party, the , Pigpen Project, and , filed hundreds of challenges using both sections next year. Aguilar’s department responded that our challenges lacked “personal information” that the vote had moved in reply.
Aguilar has stated that the information gleaned from the post office’s National Change of Address (NCOA ) database does not correspond to “personal knowledge” if it indicates that a voter has permanently moved. However, the secretary of state’s implementing regulations define “personal knowledge” as opposed to the Nevada Revised Statutes ( NRS ). Just his mind is affected. In addition, Section 535 only requires the challenger to state that they have “personal knowledge of the facts set forth in the affidavit” ( shelving emphasis added ).
However, Aguilar, who wants to reject “knowledge obtained from a third party,” wouldn’t be able to ignore the fact that a Pigpen voluntary visited a suspected “moved” politician’s address and confirmed that the voter had moved and was no longer there.
Cementing Aguilar’s False Concepts into the law
Aguilar has added new speech to his extensive, federal election reform expenses to further define what he calls “personal knowledge” in NRS. The proposed speech is as follows:
For the purposes of this area, “personal information” refers to the facts on which each challenge is based, including firsthand knowledge, knowledge gained through, practice, or observation. The definition of”  ” does not apply to knowledge obtained from , a third party, including, without limitation, information obtained from the , a review of data, or any other information compilation.
Oh no, come in.
According to common sense, if the voting states that he no more lives there, that should be sufficient to trigger the latest resident’s election officials to issue the postcard to the moved voting asking for confirmation that he still lives where he’s registered. If a voter doesn’t ensure that he still lives it within 30 days, he will be changed from an “active” to “inactive” status, which means he won’t be mailed a ballot on his own.
Aguilar appears to be acting as though he wants those citizens to stay on the voter floats as “active” and receive an automated mail-in vote. What other action would he take to pass a law prohibiting the use of information from” next parties,” like the present resident?
Why did he attempt to rewrite the law to stop lawsuits filed by people who use the NCOA database, which was created by the US Postal Service, to determine voters who had previously moved forever from the address they are registered at? That’s exactly what the Pigpen Project has been using to identify suspected moved citizens.
Get some of this today. What the laws currently enshrined here:
NRS 293.5303: [ T]he county clerk in each state has the authority to insert into an agreement with the United States Postal Service, or any other man authorized by it to use the information for state clerks to correct the sections of the statewide vote subscription list that are pertinent to the county clerk.
NRS 293.5303:   if a state secretary enters into an agreement under NRS 293.5303, the county clerk may review each change of address notice sent by a county resident to the Postal Service and discover each resident who has changed addresses and registered voters. The state clerk may message a notice  to each registered voter in accordance with the procedures set forth in NRS 293.530.
Then let’s make certain everyone is aware of the total nonsense that Aguilar is saying.
The county clerks are permitted to use the NCOA database to clean up Nevada’s ugly voter rolls by laws, but they are not required to do so. In other words, the Pigpen Project’s use of the same database to identify moved citizens has been permitted for our state rulers. However, the great unwashed doesn’t.
Then, if the county clerks were doing it, this wouldn’t be that big of a bargain, and the voter rolls wouldn’t be so murky. However, the staff have either chosen to use the NCOA databases to clean the voter data or are using it insufficiently, for different reasons.
The Pigpen Project has been attempting to assist them, only to have Aguilar instruct us to throw it up our keisters. And he now wants to pass a law governing his barrier.
Why? He truly seems to opposes the county clerks or us , who clean the voter rolls.
Looking the various means
Aguilar is now using “personal knowledge” as an excuse to not look into voters who the NCOA database claims have completely relocated and yet who, by mail, appear to have still cast ballots in November.
Today, be aware that the post office is supposed to send ballots to a vote if the voting has moved, but not also that they are. Also, it’s very likely that someone other than the voter got hold of the voter’s mail-in vote and improperly voted it if a voter who moved was still sent a ballot. Aguilar appears to be unwilling to look into whether or not that was election scams.
Iris Stone, the director of Pigpen Project, has submitted 881 Election Integrity Violation Reports ( EIVR ) for suspicious votes that have reportedly occurred recently.
However, Aguilar has since rejected and rejected them. His business stated in a reaction notice that it would not be taking actions on EIVRs that suggest a voter may have changed residence based on third-party data and no personal knowledge.
Citizens can only use issues and EIVRs to prevent their votes from being revoked by someone else who is voting improperly. And Aguilar’s AB 534 had end that remedy.
Politicians should either remove it from the act or voting against it because it is such a crucial protection. And I hope Governor. if the Democrat bulk approves the costs with this clause in it. Joe Lombardo filibusters it.
With agreement, this essay was adapted from one that was originally published by the Pigpen Project.
The Citizen Outreach Foundation’s leader is Chuck Muth. The Citizen Outreach Foundation, a 501 ( c ) ( 3 ) non-profit organization, is a project of the Pigpen Project, which was launched in January 2023.
