Harvard University made a brave decision to reject the requires made by the Donald Trump administration, knowing that it would have an impact on its finances. The university claimed in a detailed statement that Harvard must comply if we want to “maintain ] our financial relationship with the federal government. The administration also issued an updated and expanded list of demands.
Some of these demands are intended to combat racism, but the majority are intended to control Harvard’s “intellectual conditions,” according to the university.
The government’s prescription “exceeds the federal government’s authority.” It goes against the First Amendment rights of Harvard and goes beyond Title VI’s legislative authority limits. And it threatens our principles as a private organization dedicated to the development, transmission, and pursuit of knowledge. No government should be able to control what secret universities can tell, whom they can say and employ, and what fields of study and inquiry they can pursue, according to the university.
” Harvard is available to discourse about what the school has done and plans to do in order to enhance the experience of every person in its neighborhood. However, Harvard is not willing to accept requirements that go beyond the scope of this or any other administration’s legal authority, it wrote in a letter to the presidency.
What did the Trump presidency request of Harvard?
By August 2025, Harvard has implement significant leadership reform and reform to enable significant changes in accordance with this letter, including: promoting distinct traces of authority and accountability, according to the Trump administration’s letter. Measures include reducing officials ‘ commitment to engagement and lowering the energy held by students and unteneured university, etc.
Through all getting, promotions, settlement, and relevant practices, the University has adopt and implement merit-based getting policies and stop discrimination based on race, color, religion, gender, or national origin.
university, team, and organizational structure, it said.
Under whatever name, the University must immediately shut down all diversity, equity, and inclusion ( DEI ) programs, offices, committees, positions, and initiatives, and stop all DEI-based policies, including DEI-based disciplinary or speech control policies, to demonstrate that it has done so to the satisfaction of the federal government.
