The New York Times attacked FBI Director Kash Patel on April 11 for dismissing scientist Brian Auten, who helped Democrats portray Donald Trump as a Soviet advantage, in addition to a month earlier. Not something exact like “FBI Suspends Employee Who Improperly Abused Government Power To Protect Democrat Presidential Candidates,” the NYT article reads,” F. B. I. Suspends Employee on Patel’s So-Called Enemies List.”
Predictably, another corporate media retailers adopted the same crooked stance, most prominently in an article by” Fusion Ken” Dilanian and Alexandra Marquez on April 12 on NBC.
Dilanian is regarded as a Democrat advertising mouth, especially because she spreads lies that Hillary Clinton’s campaign has slandered as a Russian asset. According to Christopher Steele’s report author Igor Danchenko, those lays were made by allegedly Russian individuals. This implies that Clinton and Dilanian may have fabricated accusations against their political foes by spreading Russian propaganda. The now-discredited Steele, who the FBI paid for information, was once referred to as” James Bond,” by Dalanian.
Steele was paid by the Clinton campaign to create lies about Trump in a “dossier” that Democrat workers in the state helped to dirty through U.S. intelligence and law police, including the FBI. The best FBI “analyst” was assigned to confirm the dossier, and Auten was one of them. His staff, he testified to Congress in 2020, was unable to evaluate any of its obscene allegations, which included the legendary “golden showers” bullshit.
Thus Auten was already aware that the “dossier” was full of lies in 2017. The untestable, misleading information that was used by But Auten’s” Crossfire Hurricane” FBI team to scout the Trump campaign was still used, which increased the number of false leaks that saddled Trump’s second term with investigations and people suspicion.
In a report released in December 2019, Auten claimed Auten was pushing the use of the report he knew to be unverified in order to get a surveillance warrant for the Trump campaign. According to the review, Auten, who was referred to as a” Supervisory Intelligence Analyst,” contributed to the dissemination of the unsubstantiated “dossier” to other major U.S. agencies, including the CIA, NSA, Office of the Director of National Intelligence, and the White House.
By the time of [spy warrant ] Renewal Application No. 1, [ Suppy Intelligence Analyst ( Supervisory Intel Analyst ) [Brian Auten ] [spy warrant ] had not corroborated the reporting regarding Carter Page’s activities. ( 1 ) ( or subsequent renewal applications ), excluding confirmation of Carter Page’s July 2016 trip to Russia,” according to the IG report.
The IG formally acknowledged numerous social and legal errors by Auten and his FBI group in a planet in which inspectors common more frequently act to cover up company misconduct than to correct it. The IG attacked Auten and his team for using data they knew was unsatisfactory to get secret security warrants, using the FBI for social purposes rather than legitimate law enforcement, withholding information from various intelligence agencies about Steele’s unreliability, not conducting leaks of sensitive information, and disregarding clear conflicts of interest and ethics checks regarding Steele’s claims.
Our investigation revealed that FBI staff” seen far short of the condition in FBI policy to ensure that all scientific statements in a FISA application are’scratically correct, ‘” according to the report. Based on information the FBI had in its possession at the time the application was filed, we found numerous instances where the scientific assertions used in the first FISA app were false, incomplete, or unsubstantiated by appropriate paperwork.
All of this ought to be sufficient to oust Auten from his federal positions and appoint him solely for law enforcement. Other experienced law enforcement officials testified to Congress that Auten and his team likely committed numerous federal crimes, including fraud and perjury, that merit prosecution. He continued to serve as a senior FBI agent and contributed to Joe Biden’s campaign’s next presidential candidate, Hunter Biden ,’s fixation on the Hunter Biden laptop scandal.
According to Sen. Chuck Grassley, R-Iowa, Auten used FBI resources to find any tips coming to FBI offices around the country about the Biden family corruption ring and to dirt up those more than 40 whistleblower sources with false accusations that they were “foreign disinformation” while the IG was preparing that report.
Similar falsehoods were made by intelligence agencies when they pushed social media monopolies to impose widespread censorship of information that did not promote spy agency propaganda schemes like Russiagate, including the revelations about Hunter Biden’s laptop. The Biden family traded political favors to foreigners for millions of dollars, according to the laptop’s numerous documents.
The FBI continued to employ Auten for more than five years after the public was made aware of potential crimes he committed on its payroll, not that Patel chose to place a maliciously partisan, likely criminal FBI employee on leave.
Yet the same NYT that lied to Americans about Spygate, Biden’s corruption, and numerous other public matters claims in its April 11 article that” The reasons for Brian Auten’s suspension ] remain ambiguous. Further, it is claimed that Auten’s suspension is political retaliation rather than the start of justice for those who allegedly aimed to destabilize the United States as an intelligence dictatorship.
Adam Goldman, the reporter who headlined this article, is a Times national security reporter who has “been a journalist for more than 20 years.” He continued to write a ridiculously idiotic story claiming Auten’s firing is only explicable by political retribution, saying” He cannot not know all of this background or he wouldn’t have this job.”
This implies that Goldman is a paid shill for the worst people in the world, not a journalist of any kind. He’s not just a hack; he has no morals at all. Delenda Est, New York Times.
