As the famous DNA testing provider 23andMe goes through bankruptcy, according to prosecutors basic from about 30 states, including Missouri.
The states are requesting that the court appoint an impartial consumer privacy watchdog and a safety auditor to provide information to the judge regarding privacy issues, evaluation privacy laws, and make recommendations regarding the sale of 23andMe’s data, which includes the DNA of millions of people.
And in a federal judge reading on Tuesday in St. Louis, 23andMe’s lead prosecutor asserted that the business, in theory, concurs. An independent entity is essential, according to Christopher Hopkins of the law firm Paul Weiss.
In the Eastern Missouri federal prosecutor area, 23andMe, a San Francisco-based company, filed for Chapter 11 bankruptcy protection last quarter. The individual genetics and biology company reported property worth more than$ 27 million to the business as it looks to sell. The business reported that it has roughly$ 214 million in debt.
On Tuesday, the business received the judge’s consent to continue operating while going through bankruptcy.
Buyers of 23andMe, who used the business to evaluate their DNA, are concerned about what will happen to their sensitive personal information.
” Great intention will not guard this data,” reads a report filed by several state on April 15. The claims are concerned about protecting both each and every customer, as well as each and every person who shares DNA with each customer, as well as their respective future years.
The states claim they don’t believe 23andMe’s surveillance, particularly after hackers infiltrated the information of nearly 7 million customers with the business in 2023. Numerous state studies and complaints were resulted from this occurrence. Additionally, the U.S. Attorney’s Office filed a motion in the debt situation last week that raised concerns for national protection. Additionally, the debt is currently the subject of legislative analysis.
In court papers, Bailey’s office contends that 23andMe’s promises to protect customers ‘ personally identifiable information and Missouri’s Genetic Information Protection Law “ring hollow.”
The visit of a customer privacy ombudsman is required, needed, and appropriate to determine whether the sale of such information may offend appropriate non-bankruptcy law, according to the filings.
According to 23andMe, potential buyers would be required to adhere to the company’s customer privacy policies.
Appointing an independent third party to protect buyer freedom is appointed, according to Abigail B. Willie, a visiting associate professor at St. Louis University School of Law.
” Boiled down, this good is about control — who has the power to veto important data that has significance to the property,” she said. Who is in demand may influence how things play out in terms of various relationships.
On April 29th, a  will hold a hearing on the nomination of a customer data agent.
___
© 2025 STLtoday .com.
distributed by Tribune Content Agency, LLC.
