Parents are aware of what is best for their own children, if there is one thing undermining familial right.  ,
If there is a subsequent case, it’s Wisconsin v. Yoder, in which the Supreme Court ruled that kids have the authority to “direct the upbringing and education of children under their control.”
Advertisement
Enter Mahmoud v. Taylor, which is now being heard by the Supreme Court. According to Amy Howe of ScotusBlog, the question is” Whether public schools burden parents ‘ religious practice by making them participate in gender and sexual education without giving them notice or the opportunity to opt out.” Additionally, it will decide whether or not to hire college officials or parents.  ,
A school district in Montgomery County, Maryland, is the subject of the situation, which claims it would be a good idea to impose LGBTQ+ content on younger children as early as three, including younger children with special needs and vulnerable children.  ,
 is an instance;
In Mahmoud v. Taylor, the Supreme Court is currently hearing oral arguments regarding whether spiritual parents may forbid their young babies from LGBTQ storybook observations.
What Are Your Thoughts is one of the publications in the context of this event.
My adjectives resemble the… photograph, my pronouns. https ://twitter.com/fl7iMCp/
April 22, 2025— Katelynn Richardson ( @katesrichardson )
Howe explained on Tuesday as oral arguments before the Supreme Court began:
A group of Muslim, Catholic, and Russian Orthodox parents filed a lawsuit in federal court after the state announced in 2023 that it would not let kids to choose to have their children be exonerated from the storybook training. They claimed that the rejection to grant them the right to choose whether to opt out of their children violated their constitutional right to freely practice their religion, especially their right to control when and how their children are taught about gender and sexuality according to their beliefs.
Advertisement
The school district argued that the obvious material was simply too difficult for parents to opt out of, and instead of removing the highly contentious books, the district advised kids to” suck it up.” Several of them filed a lawsuit, citing Wisconsin v. Yoder as well.  ,
NPR’s Nina Totenberg reported that the school district did say that” taking children out of a lesson when a , one story book featuring same-sex parents or gay and lesbian kids had come up at any time is a logistical nightmare.” Where should the opt-out children be placed and how much should they stay there logistically? And how would the institutions then address the demand for alternate lesson plans? ”   ,]Emphasis added]
If that’s not a bow-shooting, I’m never sure what it is. In fact, the city claims that there is nowhere to hide from LGBTQ+ education in public schools.  ,
Radio:   more information
As many as 1, 000 people gather for one school panel meeting to demand their voices heard by families of various beliefs, and even children. A child who identified himself as Nick at one of these conferences stated at one of these meetings that he liked having storybooks with LGBTQ figures.
We also have right, he said. We deserve to have novels in our class that educate students about LGBTQ issues and other issues. I don’t understand why you hate it so much because it’s not touching you or hurting you actually. “[Emphasis added]
I’m sorry, sweetie. Minders do not have the authority to choose the syllabus a public school district will adopt. That is the responsibility of the school panel, which is responsible to parents. Or, in any case, ought to be. The Supreme Court may make that determination.  ,
Advertisement
Grace Peterson, one of the plaintiffs in the case, was interviewed by Totenberg because her child with Down syndrome had LGBTQ+ ebooks imposed on her at school. Because the child found the ebooks to be complicated, Peterson pulled her child out of school and started homeschooling.  ,
How many parents feel the need to choose between raising their kids in their beliefs and education, she said, “is distressing.  ,
In a Court short, the Becket Legal Fund for Religious Liberty, which is representing the families, stated:
Further demonstrating a lack of general applicability and non-neutrality was found when [the school’s prior opt-out ] policy was amended in response to parents ‘ religious objections. The Board responded to the policy change with a slew of hateful remarks comparing the ( religiously and racially diverse ) Petitioners to” white supremacists” and” xenophobes. That is the government’s attitude toward spirituality in opposition.
As liberals do in every way.  ,
This was obviously targeted at spiritual parents, Eric Baxter, the defendants ‘ attorney, said during the oral arguments on Tuesday.
It is, of lessons,. Without the assistance of troops of sycophants who were first exposed to the Official Talking Points, the Progressive Pervert Train may actually advance.  ,
One of the smartest perspectives on the event of the school district was given by Jonathan Turley:
There is a humor in the viewpoints of common academics before the Supreme Court. A reverse may be a significant step in preventing people from leaving public universities. One of the individuals discussed in this situation sold their home to allow their children to attend private school.
Some people may be less likely to look for alternatives to public schools because of limiting like required programs. These individuals want to enroll their children in public schools while still ensuring that they are able to instill religious values in their children. Some parents will make a choice between their home values and those in Montgomery County.
Democrats may discover that this is not political, it is for parents, as it was in previous parental rights debates.
Advertisement
However, we all know for a fact that neither the kids nor their families are important to The Education Establishment. They are concerned about keeping the bank accounts of the teachers ‘ unions full and supporting the progressive agenda. They’ll continue until the Supreme Court takes up its cause. This desire the Court upholds parental rights and does the right thing.  ,
Our kids are being attacked. The Left will do anything to regain their hearts and souls, and we are at a crossroads for theirs. We’re around to expose the truth about the blatant education and excess. We can continue to present you significant stories like this on Politico to promote the departed. Use the promo code FIGHT to receive 60 % off your account if you support PJ Media VIP. You can make a difference for only$ 1.60 per month.  ,
