Play is based on a UCSF investigation that some scientists contend is utterly flawed.
A commonly cited study from its own contraception research programme recently inspired the University of California San Francisco to create a perform” about what really happens when people are denied access to pregnancy.”
The” Turnaway Play” is based on a study by the same name that was published by researchers at UCSF’s” Advancing New Standards in Reproductive Health.” Its makers want to hold appearances in all 50 states in the future.
However, some academics and pro-life advocates have criticized the research for being flawed, and claim that some findings that don’t represent the study’s importance on abortion are underemphasized.
The play’s writer, Lesley Greene, confirmed to The College Fix that the efficiency follows characters who are based on the study’s participants, including the people and experts.
In a new contact, she stated that the play is “inspired and informed by the pioneering Turnaway Study, conducted by Dr. Diana Greene Foster, a 2023 MacArthur Fellow and researcher at the University of California, San Francisco ( and my girlfriend ).”
The objective is to” spark dialogue about the effects of pregnancy restrictions, spread awareness about state vote measures, and organize followers to support improved access to abortion.” and to receive analyses of the play across all 50 declares”! Greene addressed The Fix.
On April 6, UCSF held a functionality. Additionally, the sing website has a shape urging people to stage a performance in their area.
According to the play site, many other schools currently have, including Duke University, Ithaca College, the University of Cincinnati, and Georgetown University, a Christian organization.
Greene told The Fix,” The enjoy uses the words and activities of these actual people to knock myths and combat abortion stigma.” There is also a lot of humor and audience involvement.
She claimed that 1, 000 ladies were followed for five years by her sister and the ANSIRH study group to examine the issues that women face when denied an abortion.
According to Greene,” the principal finding is that having an abortion doesn’t harm a woman’s health and well-being, but that being denied one actually leads to worse financial, health, and family outcomes,”
The study found that women who were denied abortions were “more likely to stay in touch with a harsh partner” and “more likely to struggle financially many times later.”
While the study has received a lot of media attention for years, some scholars claim that it has substantial flaws.
Bowling Green State University Professor Priscilla Coleman wrote in a document that the study had flaws. According to her study, it disregarded fundamental scientific principles and prevented discussion of the potentially dangerous effects of pregnancy on women’s health, as The Fix previously reported.
In an email to The Fix, Secular Pro-Life senior director Monica Snyder also expressed concern about how the general public would interpret the investigation. Snyder has not seen the sing, but she claims that the investigation has had “quite a lot of effect” on the contraception conversation.
The Turnaway Study’s asymmetrical policy has simplified social debate about abortion, making the public think that abortion denial is subjugation and abortion is liberation, she said.
Snyder, who frequently brings up the study when she speaks on campus at school, claimed there is more “misunderstanding and shame regarding people choosing to take our babies in difficult situations, including women who do not want abortions even while in abusive relationships, in hunger, or after receiving negative prenatal diagnoses” as a result.
She claimed that the research is well-known for its findings that people who are denied abortions battle in many ways.
According to Snyder, the same study “also discovered that women who give birth after being unable to kill end up declaring they no more wish they had aborted.”
By the end of the study period, 98 % of women who gave birth to and raised their children ( as opposed to placing for adoption ) claimed they no longer wished they had aborted and that bonding with them was a major factor in their positive, retrospective retrospective evaluations of their abortion denial, according to her.
But, she said, these observations frequently get “overlooked” in the news reports that mention the investigation. She claimed that the ANSIRH site also doesn’t discuss them.
Snyder questioned whether the sing made any mention of people who were finally content to not have abortions.
Snyder said her main points when she discusses the study’s college campuses are that” the honest opinions and plan preferences people derive from the research are based on plainly incomplete details. I want people to consider why some findings ‘ researchers discuss them so much more frequently than others.
MORE: Professors of economics claim that abortion benefits because it lowers black birth rates.
IMAGE CAPTION AND CREDIT: Actors in” The Turnaway Play” hang condoms around the brim of their hats. The Turnaway Play
Follow The College Fix on Twitter and Like us on Facebook.
