This year, Arizona Democratic Senator Ruben Gallego suggested a different approach to the Trump president’s$ 1, 000 salary plan encouraging illegal immigrants to self-deport. This post sparked discussion on social media.
Gallego wrote on X,” Why don’t we force them to pay a$ 5k fine, go through a background check, and grant them a work visa for a few years, renewable with good behavior?” The Department of Homeland Security made the announcement that it would pay$ 1, 000 to illegal immigrants who voluntarily leave the country and help with their travel expenses using the newly updated CBP Home app.
The Trump administration has made immigration enforcement a key component of its strategy, pushing for large persecution and encouraging volunteer absences through opportunities. Kristi Noem, the secretary of homeland security, claimed the new plan offers a” safe and cost-effective” way for people to leave the US, projecting that the use of the app could lower deportation costs by about 70 %.
Some people, who claimed Gallego promoted illegal immigration, fast criticized his post. One person posed the question, “You’re telling people who are legalizing membership that you want unlawful immigrants to spend$ 5, 000 to cross the line even though they broke the law.” Gallego responded,” Job card is no citizenship.
Another user suggested that employers be required to pay union wages while preventing immigrants from receiving federal benefits or election. Gallego responded,” If they have a card, they have no right to whatever you mentioned. Although I believe it’s a express matter, union wages would be fantastic.
When questioned why illegal immigrants should be permitted to stay at all, Gallego responded,” I am okay with that, this certain the line second then.” Gallego responded to user suggestions that the fine should be higher than$ 5, 000, saying,” It can be higher. It simply needs to be useful.
Immigration proponents and opponents of the self-deportation plan have warned that leaving the US without completing immigration judge proceedings could result in involuntary imprisonment directions and the rejection of prison programs. The game doesn’t ensure there won’t be legal consequences for those already in elimination deliberations, according to Aaron Reichlin-Melnick of the American Immigration Council.
Trump defended the plan, saying that if migrant workers are” good people” and “love our country,” they might” come back in.”
