According to an Indiana teacher, the plan would reduce “women to breeders” and” second-class” people.
In a new interview, a professor at the University of Southern Indiana compared the proposed$ 5, 000 “baby benefit” for the Trump administration to the Nazi totalitarian plan.
According to Denise Lynn, a professor of history and identity reports, the Nazis instituted a similar plan in Germany to” extend people, effectively, to second-class citizenship.”
According to ABC News, the Trump administration announced in April that it would consider giving parents a$ 5, 000 “baby bonus” in an effort to support and encourage people. A second idea under consideration would be to make a” National Medal of Motherhood” in honor of people who have six or more babies.
When asked about the “motherhood” medal, Lynn ( pictured ) responded,” It really reduces women to breeders.
It disregards the extreme difficulty of birth. You have eggs and a placenta, but that doesn’t think you can’t have kids. Do you no longer own position in your own country if you can’t have kids and have a uterus and ovaries? It minimizes father and parenthood. There are” so many levels of issues,” she told the Huffington Post.
Although Lynn praised the Trump administration’s proposal for a$ 5, 000 aid test, she criticized the Trump presidency for saying she supported parents and children through “maternity left, Medicare for all, enough prenatal and postnatal care, and affordable childcare.
According to her statement to the Huffington Post:
The other day, I was talking to one of my coworkers about the proposed$ 5, 000 allowance for a parent. That brought up the money that Nazi Germany granted to light Aryan families. That and I are quite similar. Additionally, it’s a joke that$ 5, 000 won’t be enough.
” Under Nazi Germany’s racial health laws, they distributed loans to people, especially to the spouse, promising you could decrease your payback amount with every succeeding child. The totalitarian triple K, Kinder, Küche, Kirche, which means” kids, house, church,” is one of the main things that the people I studied talked on well into the Cold War. Basically, this pro-natalist philosophy wanted to confine women to second-class citizen.
Lynn even made a connection between Republican leaders ‘ pro-family initiatives and genetics and prejudice, continuing:
” In American history, pro-natalist plans were directly connected to genetics. When middle-class and upper-class white people were having fewer babies, genetics became practiced in the United States, but newcomers and people of color continued to have more babies. Many of that has to do with access to birth control info, and eugenicists wanted to completely alter the text and promote light baby costs. However, only acceptable white baby costs.
” We is certainly still see the language of eugenicists now. Forcing baby laws, in my opinion, put people of color in danger the most because whitened nationalists have no interest in their birth effects, which is a coincidence. They simply care about having more light children.
However, other scientists have urged more support for people of all races, citing research that demonstrated how beneficial marriage and pregnancy are to both people and society.
Less: San Francisco State University opens a family study room for parents and children.
IMAGE CAPTION AND CREDIT: A family is working from home while her baby is being held. Shutterstock/Goodluz
Follow The College Fix on Twitter and Like us on Twitter.
