The Biden administration imposed an excessive good unfairly on a Christian school, which President Trump’s schooling department has recently reversed.
The U.S. Department of Education ( ED ) rescinded a$ 37.7 million fine, with prejudice, that was proposed against Grand Canyon University, removing any allegations against the university, announced Grand Canyon University on May 16. Many people believed that the Biden administration was targeting the academy based solely on its Christian affiliation, which seemed to be a good assessment.
Advertisement
There are no results against GCU, or any of its workers, officials, agents, or contractors, and no good is imposed, according to the situation dismissal from ED. The Trump ED found that GCU did not violate any Title IV needs, rejecting the claim that GCU” greatly misinterpreted” the costs of its graduate programs.
The information clearly support our claim that we were defrauded of misleading our Doctoral students, according to GCU President Brian Mueller, and we appreciate the acknowledgement that those charges were unsupported.
Connected: Trump’s Education Department Releases New Grant Priorities to Renew Education
He asserted that GCU is a leader in innovation, accountability, and best practices in higher learning, and that we look forward to working with the Department in the future, just as we have done with all regulatory bodies.
According to GCU, the Department of Education’s largest good against a college was the Biden good. Other than ED, various regulatory bodies and courts have even approved GCU:
Similar complaints in Young v. GCU were recently rejected by two federal courts.
In its 2021 complete evaluation, the Higher Learning Commission called the University’s statements “robust and detailed”
In its assessment that examined GCU’s statements and procedures, the Arizona State Approving Agency of the Department of Veterans Affairs in March 2024 discovered” no supported results.”
Advertisement
GCU prevailed in two latest court cases against national laws. A Federal Trade Commission complaint against GCU was dismissed in March by the U.S. District Court of Arizona, while a Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals panels determined that ED exceeded its legal authority. Since GCU is not in reality a company that is “operating for its own revenue or that of its people,” the district judge ruled that the FTC has no legal standing under the FTC Act.
In its conclusion, GCU provided a list of the organizations that “have now either directly refuted, come to the opposite conclusion, or reigned in government overreach regarding false claims regarding GCU’s doctoral disclosures and/or tax-exempt 501 ( c ) ( 3 ) Arizona nonprofit status.”
U.S. Department of Education,  ,  ,  ,  
 ,  ,  ,  , IRS
Status of Arizona, Â Â , Â , Â
Higher Learning Commission,  ,  ,  ,  ,  ,
The Arizona Private Postsecondary Board of Education,  ,  ,  ,  ,  ,  ,
The Department of Veterans Affairs ‘ Arizona State Approving Agency, or  ,  ,  ,  ,  ,  ,  ,
Grand Canyon University v. Cardona, Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals,  ,  ,  ,  ,
In Young v. GCU, the 11th Circuit Court of Appeals and the U. S. District Court for the Northern District of Georgia respond with  ,  ,  ,  ,  ,  ,  ,  ,  ,  ,  , &nb
In FTC v. Grand Canyon Education, Inc., Grand Canyon University, and Brian E. Mueller, U. S. District Court of Arizona,  ,  ,  ,  ,  ,  ,  ,  ,  ,
Advertisement
The Trump presidency has confirmed that GCU’s harassment was unfair and unjustifiable.