The GAO, which is an independent watchdog body, generally operates outside of President Donald Trump‘s control, and he cannot replace its chairman, Gene Dodaro. But that hasn’t stopped the White House and the legislative Republicans from waging an office-to-office conflict.
Sen. John Curtis (R-UT) told investigators last month,” We’re going to argue the power of the Senate immediately to use the Congressional Review Act on guidelines that have been submitted to Congress.” The GAO has no authority to reject that, it says.
A GAO report found that the Trump administration had violated the Impoundment Control Act by canceling$ 5 billion in funding for charging stations for electric vehicles that had been approved by the preceding Congress. Republicans contend that they overturned a law that was passed in December of this year, not because of cash.
The Impoundment Control Act of 1974, which is also in the White House’s midst, is one of the numerous studies GAO has begun into the Trump administration. The administration thinks the action is illegal, and that presidents have used it for almost 200 years.
Rep. Republicans, echoing that position, ended what GOP members referred to as an EV authority based on California emissions standards last week by disregarding the GAO’s guidance.
Finally, Russ Vought, the chairman of Trump’s Office of Management and Budget, attacked GAO on X.
Only so we are all cleared over the next few weeks, he wrote. The government responsibilities company, or GAO, is a quasi-independent branch of the legislative branch that participated in the first-term prosecution scandal. Because they want to “grow our job to properly maintain taxpayer dollars to a halt,” they will refer to everything as an impoundment.
These are events without no consequences, he continued. ” Back picture stuff”
Sen. Mike Lee (R-UT) stated that “GAO has lost credibility as an independent figure.”
The issue centres on whether the Senate violated the senate by passing it with just a simple majority vote, as well as the pond.
Republicans may live long enough to dread the actions, according to Democrats, who were furious.
Democrats may be breaking their promises and going nuclear, they say. This is nuclear, according to Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer (D-NY ) according to Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer (D-NY). No offense here; Republicans have set a fresh law that may annoy them and this room. What revolves revolves revolves about.
According to a GAO director, the organization is operating within the terms of the law.
“GAO is focused on its goal of supporting Congress in carrying out its legal jobs,” they said, and we stand by the caliber of our work. Our legal choices do not adopt a place on a program’s plan objectives. To help Congress’s authority over the purse and oversight functions, our legal decisions merely consider the legal ramifications and compliance with the law.
Trump and his team’s expansive view of the government’s authority has drawn opposition from congressional Democrats, separate agencies like the GAO, and federal courts.
The Trump presidency claims that the GAO has lost trust as an independent business and is acting in a political way, just like the “woke” judges. Trump’s first expression was marred by the stress when GAO discovered in 2019 that he had attempted to withhold protection funds from Ukraine, which was the basis of the Democrats ‘ first impeachment case.
According to Richard Stern, a researcher for the Heritage Foundation,” the GAO generally makes recommendations on the laws, on what is being followed or never followed in terms of the Impoundment Control Act.” The Impoundment Control Act’s propriety is, yet, the real issue.
Stern claims that GAO is also within its rights to make suggestions to Congress, but that it is going too far.
He said,” I wouldn’t say that it’s actually inappropriate for them to be making these advice.” It’s just that the comments they’re making are a little off the wall, they say.
Curtis contends that this case’s law was broken, but that GAO violated it by making a decision without asking.
Why does Trump want to buy Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac, the two biggest mortgage lenders?
He told the Washington Examiner,” It is precedent-setting, but it is a law we need to set for exactly what the function is.” ” Congress ought to be able to converse on this.”
According to Curtis,” It’s not even near,” to the notion that the GOP is essentially destroying the legislature.
