The ICC’s Phantom Authority: Why the United States Doesn’t Answer to Uninvited Judges

When a Homeowners ‘ Association tries to polic the following town over

Imagine that you reside in a rural Western city. The homeowners ‘ association in your neighborhood enforces regulations governing the height of the lawn, the color of the box, and the availability of ship parking spaces in the road. &nbsp,

Today imagine that the same Association decides to pass a law that the same village not agreed to, had no agreement, and had its own rules enforced. &nbsp,

They might make an announcement that you’ll face penalties or even be detained for breaking their guidelines in the future. You’d call the police or grin them off the strip.

That’s exactly how ridiculous it is for the International Criminal Court ( ICC ) to believe it can issue arrest warrants for officials from nations like the United States or Israel. &nbsp,

These countries did not consent to its jurisdiction.

This is not just legal fantasy. &nbsp,

It’s excess that is haughty. &nbsp,

The ICC has then veered into conflict with both real and the U.S. Constitution with arrest subpoenas issued against Israeli officials and long-running investigations into U.S. military actions.

A Court With Noble Origins but a Tainted Purpose

The ICC was founded with sincere intention in mind. &nbsp,

The world desired a continuous process to keep war criminals responsible after the evils of World War II and the Nuremberg Studies. &nbsp,

The Rome Statute was adopted in 1998, laying the foundation for the establishment of the International Criminal Court ( ICC ) in The Hague.

The ICC currently has 125 members, according to the&nbsp. However, some of the world’s most powerful countries, including the United States, China, Russia, and Israel, have rejected to signal or accept it. &nbsp,

the causes? &nbsp,

No country should give its sovereignty to a global system with no checks and balances, no political responsibilities, and no people’s legal authority, as it seeks to do.

Why the United States Rejected the ICC: From Signing to Punishment

The Rome Statute was signed by Bill Clinton in 2000 but he soon said against ratifying it without significant changes. &nbsp,

In 2002, George W. Bush “unsigned” it fully. &nbsp,

Barack Obama always pushed for approval, despite his corporatist tendencies. &nbsp,

Also Biden avoided trying to get it approved by the Senate because he was aware that it would fail.

We passed legislation that made it clear how unpleasant it is, and the United States didn’t really decline ICC membership in a polite manner. The” Hague Invasion Act,” or the 2002 American Service-Members ‘ Protection Act, authorizes the United States to use” all means necessary and appropriate” to free American citizens or allies who have been detained by the ICC. &nbsp,

Yet military force, I suppose.

Congress wasn’t playing a bluff. &nbsp,

They were drawing a dark range.

Additionally, the Act forbids funding from the court and prohibits U.S. assistance with ICC examinations. In response to concerns that politically motivated prosecutions might objective American diplomats, officials working in high-stakes political environments or combat areas.

Independence comes first, often, according to the Trump Doctrine.

The United States imposed sanctions on ICC officials in 2020 after they attempted to investigate U.S. do in Afghanistan, a country that previously granted legal authority. &nbsp,

The Trump administration referred to the ICC’s actions as a” risk to U.S. regional sovereignty.”

In June 2025, those same&nbsp, ICC officials are once more flexing their absurd muscles, pursuing Israel’s prime secretary and defence minister with imprisonment permits relating to Gaza. &nbsp,

This is criminal engagement, no international law. &nbsp,

Under President Trump, the United States once more reacted with sanctions against four ICC judges who had participated in the operation and help for Israel.

Defaming: A Law Without Authority

The truth is this: there is only lawful action when it is appropriate. &nbsp,

The judge rejects your lawsuit because you did not agree with the neighborhood’s principles when they tried to sue you under their HOA’s rules.

The ICC doesn’t view it that way, though. &nbsp,

Their arrest permits against Israel assert control over Palestine’s alleged independence, a position that is not acknowledged by the United States or the UN. &nbsp,

The ICC has a backdoor into areas that have never opened the top, which is a bureaucratic ruse.

It is the tenants ‘ right edition in international law. And if it weren’t but harmful, it would be absurd.

There is no limit to who the ICC you target next if it can consider control based on a disputed say to independence or a politically friendly place. &nbsp,

It results in a program where activist attorneys and unaccountable judges, not by political will, decide who is dragged before a worldwide tribunal.

The actual thieves are where? The Solitude of Solitude: The Hypocrisy of Solitude

This not assume that this is applied equally. &nbsp,

Where are the allegations made by the ICC against Chinese leaders regarding the treatment of Uyghur Muslims? &nbsp,

For Ukraine before 2022, against Russia? &nbsp,

Against Hamas’s officials ‘ use of civilians as human weapons?

Crickets.

Justice is not just without continuity. &nbsp,

It’s a theatre. &nbsp,

And when a judge turns into a platform for social posturing rather than an impartial truth-telling tool, it loses its spiritual weight to validity.

What Happens Next: The Potential Overreach of the ICC

The Hague’s courts won’t be the only ones where the ICC is still operating.

First, the chance for American and allies traveling abroad is increasing tremendously.

Troops, diplomats, or humanitarian workers may pause to intervene in conflict zones because they run the risk of being sued by a court they don’t understand.

That reluctance could result in the deaths of citizens, friends, or our own citizens.

Next, it encourages bad players. &nbsp,

What information does it take if Israel is punished for protecting its members while criminal officials hide behind facilities? &nbsp,

That is the policy of social equivalence. &nbsp,

That propriety is determined by popular demand. &nbsp,

If you don’t stand up for your folks, you might be arrested.

Third, it undermines confidence in genuine global assistance. &nbsp,

When an inexplicable body asserts power over other countries without giving a damn, it poisons efforts to form coalitions in areas of trade, security, or humanitarian aid. Supporters don’t follow orders. &nbsp,

They act with dignity.

Third, it sets the tone for various international organizations to execute the stunt. &nbsp,

What prevents the World Health Organization from enforcing health policies in Texas if the ICC can problem warrants outside of its purview? &nbsp,

Or did UNESCO decide to outlaw Oklahoma’s texts?

The door may be shut once it has been given permission to go to leadership.

The American Doctrine: Consent of the Governed

The idea that rules require the governed’s consent was the foundation for the United States. &nbsp,

That’s why we have inspections on authority, a Constitution, and elections. &nbsp,

We do not recognize the authority of foreign judges who appear to be in charge of German courts and never will do so.

International cooperation is necessary, but it must be earned rather than assumed. &nbsp,

No amount of fashionable clothing, Latin expressions, or globalist sentiment you change the fundamental truth: you can’t rule over people who have never been given the opportunity.

Give the packaging for the HOA

Let’s go back to the analogy: if a homeowners ‘ association from three different towns over demanded that you mow your grass in a certain manner, you wouldn’t accept it. &nbsp,

You would shut the door, ask them to depart, and visit the judge if they refused to do so.

That’s what the US needs to keep in mind when it works with the ICC. &nbsp,

Opened the entryway. &nbsp,

Refuse to work together. &nbsp,

Implement restrictions. &nbsp,

Use every legitimate and political application to remind Americans that America governs itself if they persist.

The ICC may believe it has the highest social standards. However, it has no power without acceptance. &nbsp,

And without any power, it’s simply a group of trespassers pretending to be judges in a court without any authority, accountability, or respect for those it seeks to impose.

They don’t belong in this place. &nbsp,

And it’s great occasion they were reminded.

Hamas renewed the peace. They continue to be portrayed as subjects in the internet.

We accurately describe jihadists. Use the script FIGHT to save 60 % when you join PJ Media VIP.

Source credit