So supports the loop court’s finding that top was “reasonably interpreted to demonize” people.
The U.S. Supreme Court has declined to speak the charm of a middle school student who was prohibited from wearing a t-shirt that read” There Are Only Two Women” at school.
According to the conversation password at Nichols Middle School, seventh-grade honor pupil Liam Morrison was forbidden from wearing the shirt for more than two years.
The code mandates that” clothing had not express, reflect, or represent hate speech or pictures that targets groups based on race, ethnicity, gender, sexual orientation, gender identity, religious associations, or any other classification,” according to the script.
Morrison ( pictured ) was sent home because he refused to change his shirt as per the administration’s instructions. Eventually, he donned a top titled” There Are CENSORED Genders,” which received the same fervor.
Morrison gradually brought a lawsuit against Middleborough, claiming his First Amendment rights were violated.
According to the lawsuit, Middleborough Public School officials may “censor expression that they deem incorrect or that they intuitively determine targets a particular team even if this expression is not significantly and significantly disruptive” as per the speech policy.
The SCOTUS’s refusal to discover the appeal, according to Massachusetts Lawyers Weekly, leaves the first U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals ‘ decision unchanged.
The first circuit argued in part that Morrison’s shirt didn’t “target” a particular student, but that the school is justified in outlawing such messages if” the expression is fairly interpreted demeaning one of those characteristics of private identity, and]… the degrading message is relatively forecasted to “poison the academic atmosphere.”
MORE: Professor slurs the student out of class and slurs him because he claims there are only two women.
Attorney for the plaintiffs, Deborah Ecker, claimed that the case’s unwillingness to hear it showed that it was “focused on the law of Tinker , [v. Des Moines Independent Community School District ] and the situations that have followed.”
Harvey Silverglate, co-founder of the Foundation for Individual Rights and Expression ( FIRE), disagreed, claiming Morrison’s situation was” the simplest of cases” and a” clear violation of Tinker.”
According to Silverglate, “political accuracy is extremely dangerous in our society.” We are training our kids to be tiny hot-house flowers if we didn’t listen to opinions or allow [demonstrations that bother us.
He continued,” They will experience all kinds of hate speech and thoughts they find awful” when they graduate.
Justices Thomas and Alito disagreed with the SCOTUS’s decision to grant review. Morrison’s shirt “plainly did not cause a “material disruption,” according to the former, while the latter asserted that the First Circuit” cherry-picked ] which First Amendment principles it considered dignified of allowing through the schoolhouse gates.”
Alito added that “absent a’specific showing’ of such a [classroom ] disruption [like ] threats or acts of violence on school premises,” this justification for suppressing student speech does not apply.
Further: University retaliates against students who claim there are two genders. Until today.
IMAGE CAPTION & CREDIT: Liam Morrison poses in Alliance Defending Freedom’s” Two Genders” t-shirt.
Follow The College Fix on Twitter and Like us on Twitter.
