TikTok,  , the popular cultural video item, sued the U. S. authorities on Tuesday, saying the government’s new laws that may ban the game violates First Amendment rights to free speech.
President Biden last month signed into law a bill that would essentially boycott the company in the U. S. if its Chinese user, ByteDance, does not sell TikTok’s U. S. activities. A ban or sale was deemed necessary in response to concerns raised by the app’s ties to China, according to lawmakers who supported the law.
The Act, according to TikTok and ByteDance, “has no doubt that the 170 million Americans who use the platform to communicate in ways that cannot be replicated elsewhere” will be forced to shut down the company by January 19, 2025.
The Justice Department made no comment.
TikTok and ByteDance stated in the court filing that they have been attempting to work with the Committee on Foreign Investment of the U.S. government since 2019 to address security concerns. Under the terms of a deal spelled out in a 90- page draft agreement, data collected about Tik Tok users in the U. S. was to be handled by Oracle, the U. S. tech giant. According to the proposed agreement, Oracle is required to check TikTok’s programming code for vulnerabilities and for independent monitoring of the platform’s content, according to the D.C. Circuit filing.
The draft agreement also stipulated that TikTok could be forced to pay financial penalties if it did not, according to the businesses.
According to ByteDance and TikTok in its filing,” the terms of that negotiated package are much less limiting than an outright ban.”
However, according to the filing, TikTok and ByteDance claim it is unclear why the committee ultimately decided the proposed agreement was insufficient and that they “insisted that ByteDance would be required to divest the U.S. TikTok business.”
The new law, according to TikTok and ByteDance, “offers no support for the idea” that TikTok’s Chinese ownership poses risks to national security.
When First Amendment values are in question, the businesses claimed in their filing that” speculative risk of harm is simply not sufficient.”
By working with Oracle to move some of the security issues, TikTok and ByteDance said in the filing.
TikTok and ByteDance are suing for a court order to stop the government from enforcing the new law as part of their lawsuit.
” These are going to be difficult issues to thrash out”, said Carl Tobias, a law professor at University of Richmond.
According to Tobias, the government’s national security argument is one of TikTok and ByteDance’s issues. ” Federal courts tend to be pretty deferential to those kinds of assertions, especially from Congress”, Tobias said.
Other legal experts concurred that TikTok’s case is strong. According to David Mirell, a partner at Greenberg Glusker, the government will be under a significant burden to demonstrate that the First Amendment does not prohibit the government from doing so.
” If I had to choose which side of the case to be on, I would be on TikTok’s side”, said Mirell, who focuses on 1irst Amendment issues.
With more than 1 billion users worldwide, TikTok is a significant component of the video creator ecosystem. Small businesses rely on TikTok to promote their goods, and its Culver City office’s Culver City office’s location is closer. According to city data, the company has roughly 500 employees in Culver City.
ByteDance claimed in its filing that TikTok’s U.S. operations would not be possible to separate the rest of the business, in part because the social video app’s borderless nature allows for international content to be combined with U.S. videos.
” Such a limited pool of content, in turn, would dramatically undermine the value and viability of the U. S. TikTok business”, the filing said.
The algorithm its developers created that seamlessly feeds content to users based on what they have previously watched has contributed to TikTok’s enormous popularity and value. The Chinese government has stated in its filing that it will not permit the divestment of the recommendation engine, which is essential to TikTok’s success in the United States.
Even if the highly desired algorithm was n’t included in the deal, analysts said had predicted that some businesses and private equity firms would be interested in buying TikTok.  , Potential buyers , could include Oracle and Microsoft, said Daniel Ives, a managing director at Wedbush Securities in an interview with the Times last month.
___
© 2024 Los Angeles Times
Distributed by Tribune Content Agency, LLC.
