Pro-lifers have suffered damage after social decline since the triumphant conclusion of Roe v. Wade two years ago, this June. Capitalizing on this pro- pregnancy wave, Democrats , merely announced a$ 100 million  , determination to push contraception in an effort to get back the House of Representatives. On the express level, initiatives to deregulate abortion laws continue to appear on vote all over the nation.
What seems to be missing from the general conversation about abortion is a straightforward inquiry: What is the cause of the abortion numbers? Contraception, in various forms, has been around for millennia, but the celestial rise in those seeking it out is very fresh. There are more factors contributing to the number than just legislation and systems, which must be more than just the wealthiest countries ‘ combined efforts to end the lives of their own children on an unfathomable level. It is being driven by something else. What is it?
The sexual revolution is normally targeted as abortion’s cause. While it played a significant role in helping to spread the idea of pregnancy, today’s demand for it has been much greater than the dramatic ’60s ‘ products. During the Roe years, while pro- lifers chipped apart at the Supreme Court decision officially, the pro- contraception side fought a distinct front: the side of culture. Their success depended on one thing: the widespread adoption of the feminist philosophy. They have been wildly successful.
Sexism: A Spawn of Marxism
One female leader, who connected the sexual revolution with sexism, was Kate Millett ( 1934- 2017 ), the writer of , Sexual , Elections. For her highly regarded text, Millett was featured on Time magazine’s cover and spearheaded the women’s studies courses at American universities. She was a protégé of Wilhelm Reich, who wrote the book , The Physical Revolution , in 1936. Millett assisted in putting Socialist ideas into practice in general lifestyle. Through the sexual revolution, she and many others, including the likewise dramatic Angela Davis, were able to spread the female ideology. Millett’s individual view was that people showed their endurance as men, mainly by killing the honest, such as during the Vietnam , War. People, she believed, was show they were extremely difficult by killing their own children in the uterus.
Millett and her comrades did n’t invent feminism. It had already been quietly expanding in hazy and perplexed areas as a puppet of socialism and communism. As early as the 1890s, the socialist newspaper,  , Lucifer, was stirring up in people the “gospel of discontent”, the desire for independence from husbands and children. The Soviets forged a novel alliance with the female women they had originally believed to be very capitalist. The Soviets discovered that women were simply manipulable and strong supporters of the socialist produce due to Bourgeois hatred and anger.
Among the many significant people in the feminist/communist empire was Betty Friedan. Friedan immediately persuaded millions of women that their home-based existence was a” secure focus camp.” The remedy was “productive operate outside the home,” which refuted Friedrich ‘ theory of Communist co-conspiracy. Women would become absolutely free at work.
But “productive” function depends upon one thing: unmarried women, or at least people who have someone else to watch their children. What many people did n’t realize was that working by itself does n’t give anyone a chance. The range of school’s failure to do so can also be read at the entrance to a true concentration camp, Auschwitz:” Arbeit Macht Frei“. Work will make you completely. It was a lie next, and it is a lie today.
For feminist to succeed, it also had to sell people on a more set of sits aimed at stirring up feminine anger, such as men are oppressors, women are victims, women are better off replicating men’s lives, and sexism is good for women. These directives led women to be easily seduced by the guarantee of an impressive lifestyle full of glamour, recognition, big salaries, and endless sexual partners. The Marxist bait was irresistible due to strong economics and clever marketing. Feminism encouraged women to climb the corporate ladder while also instructing them to slide down the greasy pole of the hook- up culture with its attending pregnancies, STDs, emotional wreckage, and shallow relationships.
But work and hook- ups do n’t negate female fertility, even among the most careful. Rather than reign in this dodgy behavior, feminism and other beneficiaries of unbridled sexual activities, like Hugh Heffner, pushed for abortion. It resolved the issue of what to do with all the conceived children that no one wanted to carry or take care of.
Hanging on to Feminism Despite its Wreckage
It is always hard to expose a false narrative, particularly those deeply rooted in intellectual and emotional attachment, careers, reputations, and fortunes. The smoking industry tried its best to conceal the devastating effects smoking had had on public health for decades. The truth was revealed after years of litigation and years of waiting.
But feminism is n’t smoking. A carcinogenic product can be removed with impunity from laws and regulations, but a toxic ideology that has caused 44 million children’s deaths worldwide in 2023 alone has been caused by them. These abortion rates eliminate those linked to smoking deaths, which were even at the height of the epidemic.
The movement is perceived by most feminism supporters as a benevolent grandmother. This amiable and naive approach casually glosses over the Marxist underbelly. Women today have opportunities that they did n’t have them 100 years ago, but much of it has been brought about by advances in technology, such as washing machines and dishwashers, or by significant socioeconomic advancements made possible by the Industrial Revolution and post-war economic booms, which gave families the freedom to enroll daughters in schools instead of just their sons. It is a narrow and ideological reading of history to hold the claim that women’s benefits only resulted from feminism.  ,
The enormous canyon of damage left in its wake is what feminists ‘ defenders also tend to overlook. These 44 million children have mothers and fathers who made the choice to end their lives. As Jordan B. Peterson says,” You may be finished with your past, but your past is n’t finished with you”. It’s difficult to keep the damage under the carpet because it frequently manifests itself in one way or another, typically through the female heart’s hardening.
And this, they tell us, is what has been so great for women. We now have women who are more depressed, more suicidal, more medicated, and lonelier than ever. In the broader culture, marriage and birth rates are collapsing, the war between the sexes is growing more acrimonious, the word homemaker is triggering, and we ca n’t define womanhood. Yet, culturally, we hang onto feminism, much like the addicted smoker’s yellowing fingers, who ca n’t give it up, even to the point of smoking through a trach if necessary.
We must stop believing that feminism has been beneficial for women if we are serious about helping women and protecting those who are most vulnerable. We can start breathing in the clean fresh air of the family, the importance of children, the beauty of marriage. It wo n’t be perfect, but no matter, it will be an improvement.  ,
Women and men’s work also needs to be repositioned in a way that serves more than just individuals who are obsessed with self-importance or the ideal of independence. Whatever form it may take, working is intended to serve us and give us the means to raise a happy family and lead a fulfilling life. We are not supposed to support it with our work.
Feminism is abortion’s fuel. Stop feeding it, everyone, and do it a favor.
