Democrats have tried and failed to go extreme legislation that would grant Americans what they falsely refer to as a “right” to helped reproductive systems like in vitro fertilization. Their most recent attempt is this week as the U.S. Senate prepares to vote on a Democrat-led parliamentary package that may significantly increase the government’s funding and immunity for the embryo-serialization and production companies.
The” Right To IVF Act” combines four of Democrats ‘ most extreme ART bills, including the” Access to Family Building Act,”” Familiar Families Health Services Act,”” Veteran Families Health Services Act,” and” Access to Infertility Treatment and Care Act,” to create a massive regulatory go for the reproduction business by promising to “pre-empt any express effort to limit for entry and ensure no cheerful parent — or their doctors— are punished for trying to start or expand a family
Even the most amiable corporate media supporters of Democrats ( like NBC News ) are aware that the word literally shields the IVF business from the “legal duty” found in the well-known Alabama Supreme Court case earlier this year.
The self-declared” sweeping” act would require Americans who have moral objections to IVF and another ART aspects to contribute to the production of children who are motherless and childless. The proposal’s deliberately vague language may also simply be construed to defend surrogacy and experimental , transhumanist , technologies , like artificial uteruses,  , “gene editing” , , and , the marginalization of women in procreation via in vitro gametogenesis.
Additonally, the bill would make a permanent path for taxpayer- funded ART like egg and sperm freezing, IVF, and surrogacy for millions of U. S. servicemembers and veterans.
Thanks to the inclusion of Sen. Cory Booker’s AITCA, insurance companies with employer- sponsored plans that cover obstetrician services would also be forced to use funds they collected from other paying Americans to cover” treatments or procedures that involve the handling of human egg, sperm, and embryo outside of the body with the intent of facilitating a pregnancy, including in vitro fertilization, egg, embryo, or sperm cryopreservation, egg or embryo donation, and gestational surrogacy”.
The addition of Booker’s bill by itself not only threatens to increase already high IVF costs, but it also, more importantly, encourages the promotion of babies by all means necessary in place of restorative reproductive treatments that address the root causes of infertility.
Fundamentally revamping the definition of family, as the ART described in Democrats ‘ dream IVF package often does, harms both women and babies , because it , sacrifices children’s natural right , to their mother and father to accommodate the desires of adults. Additionally, it mandates a number of morally repugnant behaviors that should deeply unsettling and irritate Americans, especially those who support life.
To increase the chances of successful petri dish conception, the IVF standard practice calls for multiple eggs to be harvested and fertilized. Since Americans undergo , hundreds of thousands of artificial reproduction cycles each year, it’s easy to conclude that countless unborn lives are created through the lab- facilitated joining of gametes, only to be pushed aside due to genetic , grading, discarded, or , abandoned in freezers.
According to data, many of these small lives would have resulted in successful pregnancy but were instead rejected due to eugenics-y testing, which frequently yields incorrect results.
Senate Democrats are choosing to continue voting on this bill package because they “believe a core tenant of freedom is being able to decide when and how to begin or expand a family.” But that’s not their only goal.
Sens. Booker, Tammy Duckworth, and Patty Murray’s fierce promotion of ART falls directly in line with their party’s abortion- for- all agenda. The same Democrats touting this legislative package , under the guise of ill- named “reproductive rights” voted , in favor , of , codifying ending life in the womb through all nine months of pregnancy under the same premise.
In fact, the senators are blatantly associated with their attempt to impose ART and its numerous costs on Americans with their vitriol for “MAGA Republicans” and pro-lifers who” continue to carry out their state-by-state attacks on reproductive freedom in post-Roe , America.” Of course, those so-called “attacks” are the passage of well-known lifesaving laws that shield both mothers and babies from the harms the abortion industry frequently imposes on them.
When given the opportunity to cast a ballot on this radical legislative package, it’s unclear exactly what Republicans will do. GOP Sens. Ted Cruz and Katie Boyd Britt both claim that life begins at conception, but they also support using federal force to deter states from regulating Big Fertility, which frequently destroys that life. Concerns about the abortion undertones in Democrats ‘ bills, however, and their GOP colleague’s previous,  , even if misguided, rejection of those bills suggests they would do well to shun the latest scheme that would codify the destruction , and discard of unborn lives.
If one thing is made clear by the most recent Senate IVF package, it’s that Democrats are not interested in stopping Americans from being exploited by businesses that prioritize profits over all moral and ethical concerns. Instead, they favor supporting those industries with laws that leave room for any dystopian and fatal ideas their owners may develop in the future.
The Federalist staff writer and host of The Federalist Radio Hour, Jordan Boyd. Her work has also been featured in The Daily Wire, Fox News, and RealClearPolitics. Jordanian completed her political science major at Baylor University and minored in journalism. Follow her on X @jordanboydtx.
