The computer was just used to indict its owner, according to 51 previous intelligence officers who claimed it was Russian disinformation four years ago.
On Tuesday, Hunter Biden was found guilty on all three felony weapons charges, decades before he’ll go on trial for national income acts in September. Biden was found guilty of violating an illegal firearm law after a week-long trial, but he was spared the far more serious criminal charges based on information that the New York Post had discovered in 2020. Although Biden avoided trial on charges of crimes plausible to expose his father, any prosecution of those crimes would have been fueled by the contents of the most terrible hard drive to date.
After a federal judge accepted the computer as evidence, the prosecution in the Delaware weapons situation presented jurors with communications and photos from the computer. In fact, a representative from the FBI, according to the Washington Examiner, confirmed the authenticity of the hard drive at the test, as well as” some particular bits of evidence from Biden’s system files and excerpts from a narrative he wrote about his habit wars.”
But the FBI href=”https://www.foxnews.com/politics/fbi-still-mum-laptop-gets-entered-evidence-hunter-biden-trial” target=”_blank” rel=”noreferrer noopener”>refused to offer remark when asked by Fox News whether the company had “any sorrow” about rejecting the computer’s integrity. Yet, the organization itself prematurely warned social media companies to locked down related stories, spreading the falsehood that the computer was an instrument of Kremlin intervention.
Many of the 51 past knowledge officials who officially promoted the 2020 Russia hoax, meanwhile, have just doubled down on the election- time propaganda.
The system reported that Fox News Digital reached out to all 51 signers of the highly scrutinized October 2020 email, which was released just before the 2020 presidential election, asking if they now regret signing it because Hunter is being sued by the trial for allegedly committing a federal gun crime. Despite the fact that the device was presented as evidence in his ongoing legal trial,” Dozens,” according to Fox, are either declining to retract or double down.
An attorney representing Ronald Marks, Marc Polymeropoulos, Douglas Wise, Paul Kolbe, John Sipher, Emile Nakhleh, and Gerald O’Shea sent Fox News a speech on behalf of the participants claiming the email to Politico in 2020 was “patriotic”. Previous CIA Director Michael Hayden, on the other hand, “hung up the phone when contacted”.
Hayden, who served under President George W. Bush and led the National Security Agency ( NSA ) during the worst intelligence failure in U. S. history, 9/11, is also on the advisory board of the left- wing disinformation group NewsGuard. Hayden claimed in 2022 that he was “perfectly good” with misinformation in order to win the presidency of Joe Biden.
” It looked like disinformation”, he told New York Magazine. ” It would be nice if we did n’t have to do anything or say anything, but the Russians were doing so much”.
Despite an on-the-record statement rejecting for description from the director of national intelligence at the time, Hayden also signed the letter along with more than 50 former intelligence officials who later debunk the notebook as Russian disinformation.
The former intelligence officials who allegedly fired Hunter Biden’s laptop are also portrayed as credible by media outlets who equally disregarded the computer’s right to legitimate election coverage. James Clapper, the original director of national intelligence, continues to work for CNN. When asked whether he regretted signing his name, Clapper responded with “no” and said he would not “publicly remove his name from the email or accept that those signing it should have waited for more time to develop.”
House Republicans are now looking into whether the CIA was responsible for the email in 2020. In December, House Judiciary Chairman Jim Jordan, R- Ohio, wrote to CIA Director William Burns demanding the firm discharge the names of any companies who are listed as members.
We are aware that previous intelligence officers frequently return to the intelligence community for their previous organizations under private contract, according to Jordan. At the time they signed the common speech, any of the participants were constantly employed by the CIA as companies or professionals.
