The election of the Green Party in the European Parliament votes may be bad for EU countries ‘ new climate goals, even though the Russia-Ukraine war has already dragged it down, despite the fact that it is not anticipated to significantly affect long-term objectives. At the 29th UN climate summit ( CO ) in Baku, Azerbaijan in November, the impact of the setback for the Greens may be felt as the 27 EU members gather to call for a new global climate finance goal as a part of a larger group of developed nations.
Even if a tectonic shift in the entire program does not occur, the tension is already being felt as a result of the continuous negotiations at the UN convention in Bonn, where the nations are attempting to come up with the broad outlines of new international climate finance before it is finally put into shape in Baku. Environmental funding is intended to assist developing nations in reducing and adapting to climate change.
Over the past few years, the EU has cleared a deal to reduce emissions and implemented a number of measures that are seen by many developing countries, including India, as trade barriers. These measures may be difficult to undo, but their implementation may be less fruitful if the Greens ‘ support is not strong.
It is doubtful that the effects may spell an end to” weather- progressive” Europe. Researchers argued that the EU’s commitments to politics regarding climate change should not be undermined. The EU is and needs to continue to be a positive force in global climate politics. With many work remaining, Europe may be serious about fulfilling its weather commitments”, said Dan Jorgensen, minister for international climate policy, Denmark. Ironically, the Greens have both held or gained votes in Denmark, Sweden and the Netherlands despite a bad performance overall. In France and Germany, the two largest EU economies that have been very vigilant with climate action, they experienced significant losses.
