Close Menu
Alan C. Moore
    What's Hot

    LOL, OK — Sad Sack CNN Is Going to Launch Another Streaming Service

    May 14, 2025

    Wisconsin judge argues prosecutors can’t charge her with helping man evade immigration agents

    May 14, 2025

    Gabbard purges ‘Biden holdovers’ on National Intelligence Council

    May 14, 2025
    Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram
    Trending
    • LOL, OK — Sad Sack CNN Is Going to Launch Another Streaming Service
    • Wisconsin judge argues prosecutors can’t charge her with helping man evade immigration agents
    • Gabbard purges ‘Biden holdovers’ on National Intelligence Council
    • Same Day a Democrat ‘Outs’ Herself as a Swinger, the Media Plays the ‘Dumb Blonde’ Card on Pam Bondi
    • ‘Don’t take medical advice…’: US health secretary Robert F Kennedy Jr responds to question on vaccinating his children
    • WATCH: Rep. Dan Goldman Humiliates Himself Defending MS-13 Gang Member
    • South African president calls refugees ‘cowards’ after arrival in US
    • Mexico opposes proposed US tax on remittances
    Alan C. MooreAlan C. Moore
    Subscribe
    Wednesday, May 14
    • Home
    • US News
    • Politics
    • Business & Economy
    • Video
    • About Alan
    • Newsletter Sign-up
    Alan C. Moore
    Home » Blog » Anti-Free Speech Supreme Court Majority Mocks Concept Of Self-Censorship In Shocking Ruling

    Anti-Free Speech Supreme Court Majority Mocks Concept Of Self-Censorship In Shocking Ruling

    June 26, 2024Updated:June 26, 2024 Editors Picks 0 Comments
    Share
    Facebook Twitter LinkedIn Pinterest Email
    image

    In the majority view for Murthy v. Missouri, wherein the nine-judge board determined the defendants lacked standing, Supreme Court justices mocked the typical idea of self-censorship on Wednesday.

    The Supreme Court punted on the legal issue of government-imposed repression of private internet firms in the 6- 3 decision. In the majority opinion, Justice Amy Coney Barrett stated that” to receive forward-looking reduction” case plaintiffs “must create a significant risk of future damage that is detectable to the Government defendants and likely to be redressed by an injunction against them.” The justice, but, added the claimants ‘ quarrels for standing were unconvincing.

    ” Foremost, they argue they suffer’ continuing, present negative effects’ from their previous restrictions, as they must then self- censor on social media”, Barrett wrote. The plaintiffs can, however,” not production standing by simply inflicting harm on themselves out of fear of hypothetical potential harm that is not undoubtedly impending.”

    ” As we explained”, Barrett continued,” the plaintiffs have not shown that they are likely to face a risk of future censorship traceable to the defendants“.

    Barrett claimed that plaintiffs were already encouraged to self-censor by the major companies ‘ pre-existing content moderation practices,” so it is’difficult how ‘ the plaintiffs ‘ self-censorship can be traced to’the defendants”.

    In other words, Justice Barrett’s decision is partially based on doubts about the beginning of self-censorship, let alone repression brought on by government efforts to curb rebel conversation. However, the plaintiffs made it abundantly clear that social media websites adopted national guidelines for their content moderation practices as part of a proxy censorship plan.

    Federalist Editor Joy Pullmann reported last summers that White House officials, for case,” treated net conglomerates like their employees”. In an email exchange between Rob Flaherty, the White House’s digital director, and Facebook, Flaherty demanded answers about why the company did n’t follow administrative requests. Pullmann then deleted the email exchange.

    ” Joe Biden even threatened to hold]Mark ] Zuckerberg criminally liable for not running Facebook the way Biden wanted”, Pullmann reported.

    And if there’s any question about the presence of personal- repression, only beg yesterday’s college students if they censor themselves — whether it be inside or outside of the class. In October, American Enterprise Institute ( AEI ) Senior Fellow Samuel Abrams reported on a survey from the Foundation for Individual Rights and Expression ( FIRE ) of more than 55, 000 students across 254 institutions that found “alarming” levels of self- censorship.

    ” Quarter of all students, both men and women equally, record often or more frequently engaged in self- censorship”, Abrams wrote. Regardless of the type of school they attend,” this phenomenon affects a majority of students across the gap between private and public institutions.”

    Self-censorship is one of the most inglorious intended effects of government censorship, according to Federalist CEO Sean Davis in a post on X. Tyrannical governments terrorize their citizens ‘ thoughts by reinforcing every incentive for them to just be quiet, according to the statement “tyrannical governments punish others for what they say and believe.”

    Self-censorship is one of the most espionage’s most perverse intentions: by punishing others for what they say and believe, tyrannical governments terrorize their own thoughts by making them feel safe.

    But in its abominable … pic. twitter.com/u1NuMOLITy

    — Sean Davis ( @seanmdav ) June 26, 2024

    George Orwell wrote about how tyrants use censorship to incite self-censorship among the oppressive classes.

    He wrote that” the main threat to freedom of thought and speech at this time is not any official interference.” ” If publishers and editors exert themselves to keep particular subjects out of print, it is not because they are afraid of prosecution but because they are afraid of public opinion.”

    However, the U.S. government is using censorship, which is carried out by private websites that act as proxy moderators for authorities who are determined to control the flow of information.

    Justice Samuel Alito warned Americans that they would soon come to regret the continuation of an unconstitutional censorship regime in his dissenting opinion on Wednesday in Murthy v. Missouri.


    Tristan Justice is the western correspondent for The Federalist and the author of Social Justice Redux, a conservative newsletter on culture, health, and wellness. He has also contributed to The Washington Examiner and The Daily Signal. His articles have also appeared on Fox News and Real Clear Politics. Tristan majored in political science at George Washington University, and he also had a journalism minor. Follow him on Twitter at @JusticeTristan or contact him at Tristan@thefederalist.com. Sign up for Tristan’s email newsletter here.

    Source credit

    Keep Reading

    Court To Smartmatic: Did Election Reporting Cause Reputational Harm Or Was It Bribery Probe? Let’s See Docs

    Democrat ‘Election Deniers’ Try To Overturn Election Of Their Own Party Vice Chair

    Here Are 16 Of The Most Egregious Injunctions Barring The Trump Administration From Doing Its Job

    Jake Tapper’s Latest Absurd Biden Gaslighting Attempt, Explained Entirely By Tim Robinson Memes

    Right On Cue, WI Dems Sue For More Favorable Congressional Maps

    Exclusive: Lawmakers Call On USDA To End Biden Era Discriminatory Policies Against White Farmers

    Editors Picks

    LOL, OK — Sad Sack CNN Is Going to Launch Another Streaming Service

    May 14, 2025

    Wisconsin judge argues prosecutors can’t charge her with helping man evade immigration agents

    May 14, 2025

    Gabbard purges ‘Biden holdovers’ on National Intelligence Council

    May 14, 2025

    Same Day a Democrat ‘Outs’ Herself as a Swinger, the Media Plays the ‘Dumb Blonde’ Card on Pam Bondi

    May 14, 2025

    ‘Don’t take medical advice…’: US health secretary Robert F Kennedy Jr responds to question on vaccinating his children

    May 14, 2025

    WATCH: Rep. Dan Goldman Humiliates Himself Defending MS-13 Gang Member

    May 14, 2025

    South African president calls refugees ‘cowards’ after arrival in US

    May 14, 2025

    Mexico opposes proposed US tax on remittances

    May 14, 2025

    Sean ‘Diddy’ Combs threatened to ‘blow up’ Kid Cudi’s car, testifies ex-girlfriend Cassie Ventura

    May 14, 2025

    Gavin Newsom Twisted So Hard Right That He Might Get Impeached

    May 14, 2025
    • Home
    • US News
    • Politics
    • Business & Economy
    • About Alan
    • Contact

    Sign up for the Conservative Insider Newsletter.

    Get the latest conservative news from alancmoore.com [aweber listid="5891409" formid="902172699" formtype="webform"]
    Facebook X (Twitter) YouTube Instagram TikTok
    © 2025 alancmoore.com
    • Privacy Policy
    • Terms
    • Accessibility

    Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.