Kids could graduate without learning about the Constitution, Civil War, or monument Supreme Court situations, writer argues ,
Arizona’s largest people organization is gearing up to adopt a new authority for students, two courses with a La importance as a graduation requirement, as universities across the country reduce diversity, equity, and inclusion policies.
Through the two programs, students will focus on topics of diversity, power, equity, privilege, oppression and alienation, learn “how historical and contemporary communities have experienced inequality”, and” theorize how to create a more equal society”, the school’s website says.
“…Classes with the Diversity &, Equity Attribute may focus on issues such as prejudice, discrimination, discrimination, discrimination, colonialism, colonialism, stigmatization, xenophobia, and other organized inequities”, the college states.
The University of Arizona’s general education curriculum update takes effect in the fall of 2026 as part of the DEI mandate. In the interim, a prominent conservative think tank in the state has criticized it.
According to Timothy Minella, a researcher with the Goldwater Institute, students will be forced to enroll in courses with academically objectionable content that does n’t contribute anything to their education.
Minella authored the institute’s report criticizing the DEI mandate. It is stated in this month’s article that “general education programs were originally intended to help students acquire knowledge and skills necessary for thoughtful citizenship and successful careers.”
However, the new DEI requirements “instead promote politically activist ideologies to a captive audience of students, who must finish the programs in order to receive a degree,” it adds.
Susan Miller- Cochran, professor of English and executive director of UA’s general education, said the courses are in response to an Arizona Board of Regents policy” to contribute to a society that values ‘ equality under the law, diversity, inclusion, and constructive dialogue through civil discourse.'”
She said she strongly disagrees with the institute’s report.
” It’s about reflection and theorization. In a telephone interview with The College Fix, she stated that she wanted to learn about theories about diversity and equity, as well as develop mental habits that help us fulfill the requirements set forth by the Arizona Board of Regents in their general education policy.
After gathering roughly 1, 000 pages of syllabi, the Goldwater report is the result of a broad public records act request from last fall. It separates several courses that fall under the DEI focus.
In “ENTO 160D1: Busy Bees and Fancy Fleas: How Insects Shaped Human History,” one of the classes it highlights requires students to “live like a bug.” In one assignment, students will create “tissue paper wings” to understand the experience of “immigrants” or people “from a different social class”.
Minella told The Fix that UA students” could graduate having’ lived like a bug,’ but without learning about the Constitution, the Civil War, or landmark Supreme Court cases”.
” This is n’t just bad policy. The Arizona Board of Regents, the body that regulates Arizona’s public universities, has issued a clear violation of the law, he wrote in an email.
Another DEI class highlighted in the report is an anthropology one called” Race, Ethnicity, and the American Dream”.
” Racism is deeply embedded in US history, society, and institutions. It is systemic”, the syllabus states. ” You’ll learn]in ] this unit that racism is a system of advantage, and disadvantage, based on race. While people of color have not had equal access to the” American Dream,” white people have unearned privilege.
Another DEI course includes” Constructions of Gender,” in which students can get additional credit by taking a” Safe Zone Training” at the campus ‘ LGBTQ center.
Minella called the courses “emblematic of the broader academic failings” of the DEI requirement.
Minella did not speak with UA scholars, according to Mieczyslaw Zak, a university spokesman, and his report is off the mark.
” The goal is absolutely not activism”, he told The Fix. ” The goal is understanding, so that students can develop their own perspective and decide how they want to move forward”.
Additionally, Zak and Miller-Cochran disagreed that the Board of Regents policy prohibits the general education requirement. They claimed that the regents acknowledged that their curriculum policy does not provide a specific list of courses and that state universities are in charge of making those decisions.
Asked about the entomology course highlighted in the Goldwater report, Miller- Cochran said” I’m not an entomologist”.
MORE: More elite colleges look to end DEI hiring mandates
IMAGE: University of Arizona website
Follow The College Fix on Twitter and Like us on Facebook.
