Next week, the White House and its kept- wing media equipment adopted a novel phrase,” low fakes”, to try and distract from the decrepit president, Joe Biden. But there was nothing “fake” about Biden’s Thursday conversation efficiency, which is why the left is now openly — and rightly — questioning Biden’s health for business.
Make no mistake: the public’s intentional belittling of the American public for years about Biden’s health and mental agility has put us in grave harm, and calls for Biden’s replacement are a tacit admission of that.
Alex Thompson, an Axios ‘ Alex Thompson, claimed on CNN following the controversy that the White House had lied about Biden’s era to both writers and the American people.
While it may be real that the White House gaslighted the electorate, the press deserves to bear at least as much of the blame as the White House. It does n’t take an expert to see Biden falling up the stairs, over sandbags, and off his bike to question his physical limitations. It’s not necessary for an expert to learn Biden’s muttering and nonsensical errors.
If a 81-year-old actor showed up for a job interview acting in the manner that Biden does, he would be sat in a waiting area until the authorities could discover the nursing home he had escaped from. An effective press would have covered this obvious threat to our nation’s safety without skipping a beat, but rather they published whatever White House-pushed talking points.
For instance, the Associated Press wrote a bit entitled” Seeing is believing? Not necessarily when it comes to Biden and Trump movie clips. The Hill published a bit titled” Cheap Fake Biden video burst into national attention.” Rolling Stone said Republicans were trying to “fuel” worries about Biden’s time with” low counterfeits” and “deceptive videos”. Deadline’s Ted Johnson said the” cheap fake” videos were simply “parrot]ing ] Donald Trump’s talking points”.
However, Joe Scarborough of MSNBC called President Biden the “best version of Biden ever,” and Alejandro Mayorkas of the Department of Homeland Security called him the “intensely sharp” while other left-wing media outlets attributed ageism.
But zero, no amount of protection from the commercial media, may account for Biden’s effectiveness on Thursday.
Why is it that the topic of conversation all day Friday is that Biden had stage over so that Democrats can designate someone who can, also, walk and talk on their own.
Biden is” a great man and a great president,” according to Thomas Friedman, a columnist for the New York Times, but he has no company running for re-election.
The best part of this controversy for Democrats, according to Mark Leibovich of The Atlantic, was that it took place on June 27.
Politico’s Irie Sentner wrote Biden’s missteps and stumbling made him “unintelligible” and that” the issue was impossible to ignore”.
But the problem is n’t new, nor was it the result of” cheap fakes”. Because they had power over how they would present Biden, the media simply chose to “ignore” it.
Instead of telling American that their lives were in danger because a person who could n’t also remember when his brother died is in charge of their national security, the shameless corporate internet chose to satisfying their deep position kids with puff-piece policy of Biden.
The Federalist’s Brianna Lyman is a journalist for votes.
