Sign up for The Texas Tribune’s regular newsletter, The Brief, to stay informed about the most important news from Texas.
Three decades after Gov. Greg Abbott has 34 miles of material bollards to show for it when he announced Texas did take the unusual step of building a state-funded wall along the Mexico border.
That infrastructure is not yet a contiguous wall; it has so far been estimated to cost around$ 25 million per mile. On Texas ‘ 1, 254-mile southern borders, it has grown in parts and is spread across at least six regions. Progress has been hindered by the state’s efforts to obtain land rights, which is one of the many difficulties that indicates a protracted and extremely expensive slog away for Abbott.
However, Abbott’s wall venture is moving along quickly because position contractors have now increased the amount of wall mileage that former President Donald Trump’s administration was able to develop in Texas. By the end of 2026, state authorities hope to create a total of 100 miles, or roughly half a hour per month. The government has often shared footage of the wall’s building on social media and given praise to the project for reducing immigration flows. To date, though, steel barriers cover just 4 % of the more than 800 miles identified by state officials as “in need of some kind of a barrier”. And construction would take upwards of$ 20 billion to complete at its current rate, assuming officials somehow persuade all private landowners to transfer their property to the state.
Under Abbott’s direction, state lawmakers have approved more than$ 3 billion for the wall since 2021, making it one of the biggest items under the GOP governor’s$ 11 billion border crackdown known as Operation Lone Star. The remaining funds are being used for things like sending migrants to Democratic-controlled places outside Texas and flooding the border with state authorities and National Guard soldiers, all of which are necessary, according to Abbott and other Republicans, to reduce the number of migrants trying to enter the country in the past.
Democrats and advocates for immigration have portrayed the wall project as a government-funded pipe dream that wo n’t address the immigration crisis’s root causes. And they say the government, in reviving what was once a cornerstone of Trump’s mission, is using public funds to raise his political property.
Even some Republicans who oppose immigration are complaining about the wall’s mounting fees.
” I am, too, concerned that we’re spending a whole lot of money to give the appearance of doing something rather than taking the problem on to actually solve it, and until we do that, I do n’t expect to see much happen”, state Sen. Bob Hall, R- Edgewood, said last fall before voting in committee to spend another$ 1.5 billion in wall funding.
A request for comment on this story was never received by Abbott’s business.
Acquiring property
The success of the state in securing the right to construct the ceiling through privately owned frontier has largely impacted the construction speed. As state vendors struggled to obtain the necessary rights early on, the task showed no signs of life. However, things improved last year as the condition began negotiating more agreements for larger sections. Through late- June, authorities had secured 79 rights covering about 59 miles of the frontier, according to Mike Novak, senior director of the Texas Facilities Commission, which is overseeing the work.
Novak claimed that state officials were negotiating with landowners about adding 113 miles at a meeting of the facilities payment next month.
” We knew from the beginning that this was going to be the drown level, you know, one of the most difficult parts of this program”, Novak said of property acquisition. ” And it proved correct. But we’ve remained unwavering”.
A spokesperson for the facilities commission claimed that officials had constructed 33.5 miles of walls through June 14.
Although officials claim they have concentrated on areas that the Department of Public Safety has labeled as the “highest concern,” the government’s ability to secure property rights has also influenced the location of the wall. TFC authorities have declined to discuss exactly where the roof is being built, citing security concerns, though Novak just said structure was afoot on roof segments in Cameron, Maverick, Starr, Val Verde, Webb and Zapata counties.
Though the Texas- Mexico border spans more than 1, 200 miles, Abbott’s budget director, Sarah Hicks, told a Senate panel in 2022 that DPS had identified 805 miles” as vulnerable, or]that ] is in need of some kind of a barrier”. Another 180 miles are covered by natural barriers, mostly in the Big Bend region of West Texas, while existing barriers already cover another 140 miles, according to state officials.
According to Novak, the construction of about half a mile of wall per week is anticipated to continue for the “foreseeable future.” At that rate, about 100 miles would go up every four years, with the full 805 miles covered sometime after 2050, when Abbott would be in his 90s.
The earliest wall construction has cost roughly$ 25 million to$ 30 million per mile, according to TFC officials. For the entire 805-mile span, that would be between$ 20 billion and$ 24 billion, or roughly three times the amount of tuition that was paid by each Texas public university student last year. The cost of maintaining the wall once it is constructed, which TFC estimates will cost about$ 500, 000 per mile annually, is not taken into account.
Another Republican who has expressed concern about the cost of the wall is Lubbock state senator Charles Perry, who last year supported Texas ‘ new immigration law that allows state police to detain people for crossing the Mexican border illegally.
” I am for border security. I am not against a wall. But to me, at least from what I can tell, it is a perpetual circle. As he sat down last fall to vote on the$ 1.5 billion wall funding bill, Perry said,” We’re on the hamster wheel.” ” ]At some point ] the response has not to be more money for infrastructure. This state must eventually draw the line in the sand.
Still, no Texas Republican has voted against border wall funding. In the state’s current two-year budget, legislators approved nearly$ 2.5 billion for the project. This is more than was alloted in state funds to all but a few of the state’s agencies, and it is more than twice what Texas spends on its court and juvenile justice systems.
State Rep. Christina Morales, D- Houston, said she does n’t think Texas ‘ GOP leadership “really understands why people are crossing in the first place”.
” Spending billions of dollars on a wall really does not address the root causes of the migration that’s happening”, said Morales, who is vice chair of the House’s Mexican American Legislative Caucus. ” Our education, our health care, and real solutions to problems that are currently occurring in Texas are what we should be investing in.”
Federal officials have recorded an average of about 2 million illegal border crossings a year since 2021, which Abbott has attributed to President Joe Biden for backtracking some of Trump’s border policies. While President Biden has sat idlely by, the governor has praised the wall’s construction as a means of “addressing the border crisis.” Republicans have been held accountable by Biden and other Democrats for stifling a comprehensive bipartisan border agreement earlier this year.
The scope of Texas ‘ wall construction and Abbott’s wider border security initiatives are unprecedented in nature because the federal government is typically in charge of immigration enforcement and the associated costs.
Even with the state’s improved pace securing easements, Novak has said land access remains the biggest challenge for the project, and “it’ll probably remain that way through most of the program”. The former president famously declared he would build the wall and demand that Mexico foot the bill for it, but the Trump administration also had the same problem. Even using the federal government’s power to seize some borderland, Trump’s administration built just 21 miles of new wall along the Texas- Mexico border.
Because Texas ‘ wall was prohibited by law to use eminent domain to gain land access, the labor intensive negotiations are necessary for the project.
Last year, state Sen. Brandon Creighton, R- Conroe, filed legislation to change that, arguing TFC officials could only build a complete wall if they were authorized to use eminent domain powers. Creighton said he plans to file the proposal again for the session that begins in January despite the fact that it did not pass the Senate.
” Of course, we can continue to negotiate with ranchers, but that is a very slow process”, Creighton said. ” And it’s an incomplete process, because there will always be holdouts for different reasons”.
Creighton, one of the upper chamber’s more conservative members, said he still supports using state funds to build a border wall, even as some of his GOP colleagues have raised objections.
” I say no to waste, inefficiencies, potential fraud and unreasonable spending as much as any member”, Creighton said. ” But… there are times, with all of that fiscal conservatism, that we have to use the money that we save efficiently to protect Texans and Texas”.
” A difficult and complex task”
Most people who support border wall efforts acknowledge that barriers alone wo n’t stop illegal entry into the nation. However, they claim a wall would function if it were combined with more technology and law enforcement officers, arguing that this would slow down attempted crossers, give border agents more time to apprehend them, and encourage migrants to seek asylum through entry points.
However, smuggling gangs have used disposable ladders to scale parts of Trump’s wall and have used regular power tools to saw through it. Some immigration experts claim border walls do n’t address the root causes of migration, such as the poverty, violence, and political upheaval in Central America, Haiti, and Venezuela, which are forcing millions of people to flee and putting strain on U.S. resources at the border.
In a 2022 report, Élisabeth Vallet of the nonpartisan Migration Policy Institute wrote,” Walls do not achieve the objectives for which they are said to be erected, they have limited effects in stemming insurgencies and do not block unwanted [migrant ] flows, but rather they lead to a re-routing of migrants to other paths.”
Those kinds of objections have failed to deter Abbott and GOP lawmakers, who are armed with a sizable budget surplus and polls that reveal a majority of Texas voters support the state’s wall effort and overall border spending. More than 90 % of Republican voters support the wall, with 74 % voicing” strong” support, according to an April poll by the Texas Politics Project.
With construction advancing, Novak has predicted confidence in the status of the wall, citing recent progress after a slow start, which saw officials construct less than 2 miles in the 12 months after Abbott announced the plan.
It’s not just land access that complicates wall construction, Novak said at the June TFC meeting, where he ticked off a list of other factors: changing soil conditions that require” complicated engineering solutions”, steering clear of irrigation systems when building on agricultural land, weather, and” sensitivity” to cattle, oil and gas and hunting operations.
” It’s a difficult and complex task, at best”, Novak said. ” But with that said, we’re whipping it. The most recent statistics reflect what I like to refer to as” steadfast progress.”
Just in: Former U. S. Rep. Liz Cheney, R- Wyoming, U. S. Sen. John Fetterman, D- Pennsylvania, and Oklahoma Gov. Kevin Stitt will take the stage at The Texas Tribune Festival, Sept. 5–7 in downtown Austin. Buy tickets today!
