Trump Challenges Old Joe to Another Debate — But With a Twist

By the time a second debate is scheduled, but it wo n’t be until Sept. 10, one candidate could be permanently cooped up behind his lavish Delaware beach house’s taxpayer-funded walls. And thus Donald Trump, fresh from looking educated, coherent, and national in the first discussion, wants a fight before then. &nbsp,

Trump received a favorable outcome in the first go-round, but he is not interested in playing a rigged farce in which communist moderators hurl handguns at his opponent and softballs at the alleged president. Otherwise, Trump is challenging Biden to a real conversation. &nbsp,

Instead of focusing on what hard-left” journalists” desire to sway Americans into believing that is important, Trump challenged the memory patient in a” no holds barred”,” all on” debate held in the Oval Office that would really address the pressing issues facing the day. &nbsp,

Trump challenged Biden to reveal his horrible record of the last three- plus years:” Allow Joe explain why he wants Open Borders, with millions of people, and some violent criminals from parts mysterious, pouring into our when excellent Nation, or why he wants Men Playing in Women’s Sports, or demand ALL ELECTRIC VEHICLES within five years, or why he allowed INFLATION TO RUN RAMPANT, destroying the people of our Country, and so much more”.

Biden was not the only one who had to face this challenge. The establishment media and all of their editors had to contend with the political disputes that had dated back a long way. The questions were primarily intended to sway the communist point of view and reflect the views and concerns of the left, both in their subject matter and how they were framed. &nbsp,

Trump is aware that trying to recruit moderators from reportedly more good, accurate, and patriotic news sites has not completely solved the issue. And so he has a fascinating solution: no mediator at all. The two individuals would be the only ones who would be addressing the issues during the discussion.

Trump continued:” It would also, under great pressure, show his ‘ professionalism,’ or lack of. It would also be a whole new test for me. What a wonderful night it would be, only the two of us, one on one, in a fine, old fashioned Conversation, the way they used to be. Everytime, ANYWHERE, ANYPLACE!! ” !&nbsp,

Debats have taken place a very long time ago. One would have to go back in time to 1858 to watch the conversations between Abraham Lincoln and Stephen A. Douglas, two Illinois Senator individuals. These were actual discussions, not the barren sloganeering and sophistry that are still practiced today. One member started the discussion by speaking for an hour, and the other candidate followed with a 90-minute response, which was the length of three of these debates, which lasted three hours. The primary candidate would next wrap things up with a 30-minute rejoinder.

Connected: &nbsp, Obama and Biden Explain Away the Discussion in a Way That Makes Old Joe Look Yet Worse

Visualize any prospect everywhere being able to communicate persuasively, or even just properly, for ninety minutes about his or her positions. There is no way that Old Joe Biden was last more than a few minutes in such a building, and Trump knows it. We saw Trump cope with angry questions much more frequently than any other leader in a century or more.

Trump is undoubtedly aware that the Trump camp has no possibility of accepting his challenge in any way. The establishment press will reject or mock the idea of a conversation of this nature. In issuing this issue, however, Trump has brought to the fore the emptiness and shallowness of little today’s political discussion. The question should now be asked: why ca n’t we see the candidates engaged in a genuine, unscripted, unrigged long- form discussion about the issues that really matter to the American people?

The left’s response is unmistakable: There are too many issues to be had in these conversations. Leftists may lose their grip on the country’s politics and media if they allowed their opinions to face genuine concern and attention. And so the sloganeering, tribalism, demonizing, and demagoguery will go on, and on, and on.

Source credit