NATO is a Dinosaur Looking For a Reason to Exist

This week, the North Atlantic Treaty Organization ( NATO ) convenes in the US to discuss how much more money member states should give Ukraine in order to commemorate its 75th anniversary. &nbsp,

However, some people in and out of the alliance question the justification for NATO’s continued presence. In 1945, when NATO was formed, Western Europe was supplicate after the Second World War. Given Stalin’s brutality in Eastern Europe, an alliance against the Soviet Union appeared reasonable and prudent. Therefore, as now, the German state depended on the United States for safety.

Now. The largest NATO countries have comparable GDPs to those of the United States. Europe does n’t want to. And here lies the American people’s conundrum.

If the member states spent the same amount of money on national security as the United States, NATO would serve as a useful counterweight to Russia and China. But that’s not the case nowadays. With a few exceptions, the majority of the forces in NATO are below par. They have n’t had to train warriors. That’s been America’s task.

But NATO trundles along, searching for a goal to support its existence. There are good, comfortable, pleasant headquarters in Brussels and a government second to none. But a army to woo China or Russia into fear of God? Not so much.

The longest-running ally in story is now in serious trouble. And as Foreign Policy publication points out, it’s actually happening this time.

Russia is no longer able to subdue and win the Western peninsula because the Soviet Union and the Warsaw Pact are no longer in place. It is true that it is engaging in illegal conflict in Ukraine and could one day harm the small Baltic states, but it is absurd to think that the Russian army will release a blitzkrieg against Poland and direct the English Channel. Even if Vladimir Putin had quite passions, an army that has had its hands complete against a smaller and weaker Ukraine is not about to become an instrument of swift regional growth.

Should NATO shift its focus to defending Western allies in Asia without the Russian threat?

Meanwhile, China has emerged as a peer competitor to the United States ( and the senior partner to Putin’s Russia ), a formidable technological contender, and the nation’s largest trading state. Today, Asia’s share of the world economy ( 54 percent ) is substantially larger than Europe’s ( 17 percent ), and its contribution to global economic growth is higher, too. China is also making territorial claims that have the potential to fundamentally change the surveillance environment there. For strictly architectural factors, therefore, Asia clearly commands a greater share of U. S. interest nowadays, and Europe clearly merits less. This is not to suggest Europe is of no importance either, but it no longer occupies pride of place among U. S. strategic objectives. NATO’s European members could n’t significantly affect the balance of power in Asia, even if they wanted to, despite recent discussion about a larger role being played in the Indo-Pacific and observers from some Asian nations being in attendance at the summit.

In Western Europe and the United States, too many people drop the risk from China despite the fact that in ten decades China will be the world’s dominant power. &nbsp,

The NATO ally is dying. Politicians or citizens of NATO nations do n’t like how attempts to resurrect it as a savior of Ukraine do. While the Russians grind the Russian army, the United States has provided more than$ 120 billion in military and economic assistance to keep Kyiv upright.

Joe Biden, a delusionist, thinks Ukraine can succeed. “Ukraine can and will prevent Putin”, he said in comment to ally members. Ukraine lacks the resources to launch an offensive against Soviet forces in any way. Volodymyr Zelenskyy, the president of Ukraine, is still beg for money and arms, but the majority of the empire wants a negotiated, sooner or later end to the conflict.

Zelenskyy’s only desire would be to get the U. S. to send an army to Ukraine and kick the Russians out. Zelenskyy needs to start focusing on what he can keep of his state rather than what he may get back from Moscow. Because it’s not going to occur,

Source credit