” A picture is worth a thousand words”, goes the old saying. A million thoughts or more has already been written about the image of Trump after he was shot, body smearing his face against an impossible azure sky framed by the American flag, and in which case he was shot.  ,
Advertisement
Numerous websites have published the photos, which were taken by AP’s Evan Vucci, as well as the “bullet image” showing the direction of the near-fatal bullet that was taken by the New York Times shooter Doug Mills, which was shot through the thighs of a Secret Service agent of Donald Trump on a Getty’s Anna Moneymaker.  ,
However, a report from Axios Media Trend Analysis on Tuesday suggested that media outlets should refrain from using the photographs lest they be viewed as “propaganda.”
In private conversations with Forbes, several photographers expressed concern that the photos from the march might turn into a kind of “photoganda” with the Trump campaign using them to advance their agenda despite the photographers ‘ intentions to document a news event.
Due to the fear of losing potential job, none may comment on the record.
A photo writer and artist from a major media outlet said that the “amount that magazines have been using Evan’s image is kind of free P. R. for Trump in a way, and it’s harmful for media organizations to maintain sharing that picture despite how good it is.”
I hate to criticize a double standard that is full of duplicity, but if Joe Biden had been the goal of an assassination attempt and he had risen to his legs or done anything to convince people that he was okay, do these jamokes be concerned about giving the prospect a propaganda success?
Advertisement
” We ca n’t control how people perceive anything”, one freelancer said. ” But you can teach them”. That statement’s conceited pride speaks a bit about the internet in general. Manipulate people’s opinions until they get to the “right” finish. Scary things.
But in the case of the Vucci pictures, it’s possible that person’s “perception” was colored by this mix of the noble and the mythical.
According to psychologist Jonathan Alter, the picture” capsulates the fact” of what American officials demand. Reagan survived an assassination attempt, telling his wife Nancy,” Sorry fruit. I forgot to duck”. A candidate goes from the normal to the spiritual with that kind of grace and strength under fire.
According to Change,” The image and the preceding event perfectly get the natural vulnerability of a strong former leader at his most vulnerable moment possible always in his life, only to be followed by that of perseverance, strength, and defiance in the face of evil.”  ,
This image very well captures the essence of what most Americans have come to admire in our heroes, both in fiction and in the world of reality: emerging from chaos with resilience, authority, and unwavering toughness,” he continued. ” Frankly, one that might change the narrative on’ toxic masculinity.'”
Advertisement
” Trump Changes ‘ Toxic Masculinity ‘” might be a bit overblown. After all, the feminists still make a lot of money out of that particular piece of nonsense. But I wonder if the perception of Trump as a president changes more than just the race.  ,
That alone would be a game-changer.
