According to a legal rights advocate, getting legal advice is essential for making changes.
Following a federal civil rights issue, the University of Southern California’s Marshall School of Business lately revised an enrollment software aimed at dark exchange students.
According to the business class, the Marshall Pathways Program was the” first Academic Admissions program designed to support Black and African-American possible exchange students throughout the application and admission techniques.”
After Professor Mark Perry complained to the Department of Education’s Office for Civil Rights, this information was removed and replaced with racial-neutral speech.
Perry began the issue in January of this year.
The former University of Michigan-Flint doctor said the key to achieving change, based on filing roughly 1, 000 complaints, is to notify the school’s legal staff.
According to Perry,” I’ve already submitted 943 federal civil rights issues to the Office for Civil Rights for race-based bias in contravention of Title IX and sex-based bias in contravention of Title VI at more than 850 colleges and universities,” Perry told The College Fix via email. After filing the complaint with OCR, I even share a courtesy copy of my problem with the university’s Office of the General Counsel in situations like USC.
Perry emphasized the value of working with a university’s authorized staff to resolve potential problems more quickly than to wait for OCR’s often drawn-out evaluation and investigation process. He claimed that it is frequently successful to deliver these violations under the radar of a school’s legal team, who is trying to minimize the risks to the institution.
The civil rights activist told The Fix that “it has frequently been very successful to take a violation to the attention of a school’s legitimate employees, and that was the situation with USC Marshall School of Business.”
According to the Office for Civil Rights, this approach helped the school get to review its software.
The University reviewed the Programme and took steps to ensure that there are no inclusion criteria based on race, color, or regional origin, according to the quality email sent to Perry.
According to Perry, fresh plans should go through “legal evaluation” to check compliance with federal civil rights laws.
According to Perry,” when new programs are being introduced, such as USC’s unfair Black-only move student program,” those programs may be submitted for constitutional review with the university’s attorneys in the Office of the General Counsel to ensure lawful compliance with federal civil rights laws,” Perry said.
He criticized the widespread ignorance or concern about federal civil rights laws within university administrations when developing programs in favor of particular groups.
Perry also provided guidance for faculty and students who want to make sure their institutions uphold civil rights laws. He suggested contacting the university’s legal staff about dubious programs or submitting external complaints to the OCR. For those concerned about retaliation, Perry offered to file complaints on their behalf, ensuring anonymity.
Two emailed comments sent last month did not arrive at USC’s business school. No further comment has been made, despite The Fix‘s recent call to a university staffer and the location of which it was recently called.
The Fix inquired about the university’s plans to fix similar issues in the future, how to handle program changes, and what function its general counsel has in ensuring legal compliance reviews.
Editor’s note: Mark Perry is a paid consultant to The College Fix on an unrelated project.
MORE: The GOP should be a Big Ten Party
IMAGES: Michael Jung/Shutterstock, Mark Perry
Follow The College Fix on Twitter and Like us on Facebook.
