ANALYSIS: Professor, traditional students say available conversation is lacking on university campuses
When interviewed during the Republican National Convention, liberal university students expressed anger with a lack of open discussion about sensitive subjects with their leftist classmates, according to a new report.
Many students told The Hechinger Report that they struggle to find options on their campuses for “productive discussions with people who have different values.”
I always engage in fruitful conversation with anyone. It’s difficult to even have a Democratic business on our school because we’re so hushed”, Alexandra Leung, a pupil at Saint Louis University, said.
Aaron Carlson, a scholar at Grace College, said he initially was surprised by other students ‘ unwillingness to discuss hard issues.
” College was an eye-opener for me because I had students who had different ideas but were n’t willing to face them in terms of those ideas,” Carlson said in a statement to The Hechinger Report.
Christopher Phillips, a student at the University of Chicago, said he has had some productive discussions with democratic peers, but more open conversation is needed.
We have a lot of shared guidelines, a lot of shared ideas on the things that have been happening in the 2020s. Things like business energy, mainstream media repression, and the consolidation of media narratives, Phillips said. ” People who are actually engaged in the political operation on the left are more likely to engage in open conversation.”
Their fears were echoed by Princeton University Professor Lauren Wright’s new observations, who is conducting research on liberal university students.
” It’s too icky”, one pro-Palestinian socialist student told Wright when asked to talk about pro-Israel arguments, she wrote recently at The Atlantic.
She cited data from national surveys that indicate that” conservative individuals are more tolerant of speakers of any intellectual flat than democratic students.”
In her own study, Wright wrote:
Only two of the progressives responded to the republicans ‘ claim that they had been challenged by academics or other students in class discussions. …
These different experiences produce a dramatic imbalance in preparedness for policy discussions on numerous topics: abortion, equitable action, ecological policy, economics, Israel-Palestine. Traditional students are prone to be chilly on both flanks of the problems. For instance, though they are usually pro-Israel, I’ve found that they can quickly identify critiques of the country’s strategy. One liberal pupil said,” Israel’s military activities make it economically harder to get the hostages out .” ” Israel’s deeds in Gaza type more terrible would toward Israel in the longer run”, said another.
The pro-Palestine students I interviewed, by contrast, could n’t describe pro-Israel arguments. They often did n’t even want to engage.
According to Wright, liberal professors and administrators who do n’t promote diversity of thought and critical thinking are delaying the progress of the students who share their views. Meanwhile, she said conservative college students are “emerg]ing ] more resilient”.
According to traditional students, professors who support their personal political views and instruct students what to believe instead of how to think are a major contributor to the problem, according to The Hechinger Report.
” ]It ] contributes to narrow-mindedness”, Carlson said.
Phillips commented:” It’s OK for]professors ] to share their political beliefs, but they better make darn well sure they’re giving students from all points of the spectrum equal opportunity to pursue intellectual curiosities”.
Further: Legal team accuses pro-Palestinian professors of ‘ powerful student speech’ with assignments
Photo: Roman Samborskyi/Shutterstock
Follow The College Fix on Twitter and Like us on Instagram.
