You can become a conspiracy theory by asking important questions about President Joe Biden’s lack following the Democrat’s return from the 2024 presidential contest via a text that was posted to an X accounts over the weekend. At least, that’s what The Washington Post’s latest content alleges.
The publication known for its constant fakery and spreading claimed that “years of reality-bending texts from Trump and others on the correct that have helped polarize the public and rattled Americans ‘ belief in a shared set of facts” in an article published on Wednesday nights.
It is neither illegal nor conspiratorial to investigate why the man who is in charge of bringing about the nation’s disappearance shortly after he appeared to ignore Democrats ‘ demands that he halt his campaign. In fact, Americans who were informed by Biden and his team that he would n’t step down should now follow this up with questions.
If the corporate media were n’t so beholden to advancing the Democrat Party’s agenda, they too would have a long list of questions about the president’s unavailability. Instead, The Washington Post claimed that questions from former US president Donald Trump and” top right-wing figures” about why Biden took a leave of absence shortly after corporate media abruptly stopped covering up the president’s obvious cognitive decline” sow doubt” and “are poised to undermine faith in the upcoming election less than four years after such false conspiracy theories fomented a violent attack on the Capitol.”
Sean Davis, the CEO of The Federalist, questioned on Sunday if it was a coincidence that Biden “did n’t drop out of the race until after the attempts to imprison and assassinate Donald Trump failed.”
Given that Davis is the CEO of a news organization that takes pride in asking questions that the corporate media refuse to ask, there is nothing inaccurate or inappropriate about his statement and query. The Democrat’s anticipated departure, despite rumors swirling weeks prior, only became public after the former president’s attempted assassination.
However, Mariana Alfaro of The Washington Post requested Davis” clarify” in a comment request earlier this week that” Biden’s announcement is connected to the assassination attempt.”
The “temper tantrum” did not stop there. A second Washington Post employee, Sarah Ellison, reached out to Davis on Wednesday just before 6 p.m. eastern, requesting that he explain his First Amendment-protected post.
” I’m wondering if you could explain what you mean exactly.” she asked. I spoke with some researchers who study conspiracies, and they said putting these events together would amount to a conspiracy theory. I want to make sure you have the opportunity to explain your intentions and respond to their assertions.
Before her article, which was written in collaboration with Alfaro, went live, Ellison gave Davis less than an hour to respond to her requests for comment.
When Davis did respond to Ellison’s initial comment request a few hours later, he pointed out that she and the paper she represents” spread false and dangerous conspiracy theories” on social media and in the publication’s pages about people who have been targeted by political violence, including Trump and Supreme Court Justice Brett Kavanaugh.
Given that you participated in the propagation of those conspiracy theories, do you feel personally responsible for the violence directed at Kavanaugh? Davis queried. Are you concerned that Trump’s supporters’ or his supporters ‘ false reporting and dissemination of conspiracy theories has sparked your paper’s concern?
Additionally, Davis noted that Alfaro” sent me a nearly identical e-mail earlier this week” but “did not acknowledge my response to her.”
According to Davis,” I ca n’t imagine it’s your paper’s policy to ignore responses you receive, only to send fresh reporters to ask the same question over and over until you get a quote to smear your political enemies,” she said.
Ellison claimed in her response that she had not learned that Davis had received the same questions earlier in the week.
You received a response on two days ago for the person you shared a name with on your absurd hit piece. Davis asked. You ca n’t possibly be serious about that nonsense. Reexamine that justification and submit it when you can at least put in a little effort to come up with something believable.
Ellison’s revision never came. Instead, she had already published her article, which accused Davis and others of using their platforms to fuel falsehoods, without any of his responses. It’s no wonder 8 in 10 Americans do n’t trust corporate media to report facts and do their jobs after The Washington Post’s performance this week.
The Federalist staff writer and host of The Federalist Radio Hour, Jordan Boyd. Her work has also been featured in The Daily Wire, Fox News, and RealClearPolitics. Jordan graduated from Baylor University with a political science major and a journalism minor. Follow her on X @jordanboydtx.
