If Only Secret Service Had Focused On Protecting Trump As Much As The Media Have On Protecting Kamala

Just Hollywood and its kissing cousin corporate internet could provide the suspension of disbelief needed for Kamala Harris ‘ transformation. &nbsp,

Is it any wonder that the marketing staff that once demanded that we believe his grossly ignorant sin president is capable of leading the free world now demands that we accept his position as president? The same outlet media that says “from the river to the sea” is n’t a rallying cry for genocide is selling us yet another bad bill of goods on Kamala Harris. &nbsp,

The Joker is presently Captain America, for Christ’s sake. &nbsp,

The exact advertising that has suggested that former US president Donald Trump is to blame for the roughly assassination is also the same advertising that is now tampering with Kamala Harris ‘ damage.

Undoubtedly, it’s the accomplice media’s update regarding this paint-by-numbers political candidate’s “work” on the boundary problems that might just be the most disturbing. &nbsp,

The’ Border Czar ‘ That Suddenly Was n’t

The usual suspects are now insisting that Biden did n’t make Harris a “border czar,” as my colleague Jordan Boyd wrote this week after making claims for years that Biden had made Harris a border czar. Case in point, the fine journalists (? ) at Axios. &nbsp,

Commercial media outlets pointed their collective fingers at Republicans for making the audacious claim that Biden, the one who is already ravaging America, tasked his feckless vice president with finding solutions to the mess the administration has created. Harris was a” convenient scapegoat” of Republican rancor, according to The Wall Street Journal, who also argued that she has acquitted herself properly by revealing that Pepsi and Nestle will invest in Central America. &nbsp,

WT true F! Speak about your Hollywood renovation. &nbsp,

However, Politico took home the victory, claiming in an X article that Harris never had the job. &nbsp,

” The site’s issues that the Trump campaign and Republicans like House GOP Chair Elise Stefanik have badly labeled Harris ‘ position, however, fall short in the face of its own monitoring, which frequently referred to Harris as Biden’s borders czar”, Boyd writes. Forbes, which was caught in its own snoop, later added an editor’s note to the original monitoring, claiming it “was one of the media outlets that poorly called Harris a “border czar.” ‘” &nbsp,

Why, pray show, did Politico make this rapid shift this month of all weeks? We ask the cross-examining attorney’s issue, of training, an answer distinct to any thoughts still capable of explanation. &nbsp,

Axios was n’t interested in that question, however. The publishing did not respond to my request for comment, sent Wednesday evening. Here’s what I asked:

Is anyone from Axios explain why the publication’s portrayal of Vice President Kamala Harris regarding border/immigration issues has suddenly changed, especially the VP’s label of “border czar”? As noted, Axios has described&nbsp, Harris as “border king” in at least one previous record. Forbes and other media shops appear to be trying to length the vice president from a start-up that has glaringly failed. Why is that? &nbsp, &nbsp,

Radio solitude. &nbsp,

Unbelievable

But let’s be fair. The contemporary image consultants have a lot of work to do. Covering for a insipid presidential candidate who prefers to campaign at a college to meet with the perfect secretary of a country where more than 1, 000 people were raped, tortured, murdered, and desecrated by jihadists is not an easy task. Still, something tells me that the same media outlet that reinvented Hamas as “freedom fighters” is up to the challenge of reinventing Harris. &nbsp,

But here’s the problem: American voters are n’t buying Kamala’s makeover. At least not yet. In the wake of Harris ‘ campaign stop in the crucial swing state, an MSNBC focus group of Wisconsin women interviewed had some damning things to say about the Democratic Party’s potential presidential candidate. &nbsp,

One voter claimed that Harris has a lower popularity rating than Biden, who has a low one. ” She does n’t even know what’s going on at the border and that’s what she was supposed to be doing and in charge of”, the voter said. &nbsp, &nbsp,

” I think she’s an idiot”, said Mary, one of the women interviewed. ” Because she has n’t done anything in the time that she’s had. As far as her three years in the White House go, we are unsure of anything about her. She’s not real smart”.

Would Kamala Harris really intervene? She has, and Mary knows it. &nbsp,

If the U.S. Secret Service had focused on protecting the GOP’s presidential candidate as much as the corporate media did preserving the image of the Democrats ‘ candidate, former president Donald Trump would n’t have been shot in the face, two rallygoers would n’t be recovering from critical injuries, and one very brave American would still be alive and with his family. &nbsp,

Matt Kittle covers The Federalist’s senior elections coverage. An award-winning investigative reporter and 30-year veteran of print, broadcast, and online journalism, Kittle previously served as the executive director of Empower Wisconsin.

Source credit