The Reason Why the Secret Service Had No Drone Over Trump Attack Will Leave You Slack-Jawed

How many times have you wondered why the Secret Service did n’t have a drone while former President Trump’s intended assassin had one since July 13? Possibly because of this, acting Secret Service Director Ronald Rowe testified at the joint Senate committee hearing on Tuesday that the Secret Service failed to use their creative thinking to orchestrate the assault. &nbsp,

It does n’t take a foray into the realm of the imagination to figure out the real answer, however. In Realville, there are numerous inconsequential responses to the question of why the Secret Service did n’t fly a helicopter over the page. &nbsp,

The person in charge of overseeing the securing the Butler, Pa., rally, whose identity is being hidden, said they did n’t green-light the use of one. &nbsp,

To put it another way, the choice to not get one from Costco or Walmart is a loss of thoughts. No one on the earth came up with that idea, in the days leading up to the assassination attempt, sometimes. &nbsp,

Connected: &nbsp, How Have These Never Been Banned From Trump Rallies Now?

The Secret Service’s lack of communication makes it impossible for it to operate a aircraft, even if it had one. Because of the site’s extensive mobile phone usage, that is. In other words, there was no specific way to guarantee that the Secret Service would be able to place the aircraft and its communications on a location other than the Beltway. That seems to be an infringement of mind as well. &nbsp,

The worst response to the question of why the Secret Service did n’t have apk by drone was that local law enforcement offered to work a helicopter for the government, but the Secret Service, ahem, declined. &nbsp,

This was revealed at the Senate Judiciary, Homeland Security, and Governmental Affairs Committees ‘ Tuesday joints reading. &nbsp,

Toward the close of his conversation with Rowe, Missouri Sen. Josh Hawley, Republican from Realville, got over to the problem. &nbsp,

Hawley: Do you know if someone was supposed to be posted to the roof]of the Val building]? [ …] Was someone posted to the roof, do you know that? &nbsp,

Rowe: I do not know that to be a reality.

Hawley: Can I ask you why you do n’t know that?

Rowe: Once, Senator, we are looking at this. And they ought to have been on that roof, which I also struggle to comprehend because of that. &nbsp,

Hawley: [ W]histleblowers are telling us more than you are, and you have n’t determined whether there was law enforcement on the roof! That seems to be a fundamental truth. &nbsp,

Either the Secret Service’s apparent stupidity or an attempt to use chaff to confound senators like Lindsey Graham (” Do you need more money?” ) is the subject of this. &nbsp,

Connected: &nbsp, Secret Service Sniper Warns of Another Death Try Before Election

Then comes the satellite problem.

Hawley: I’ve also been informed that you turned down the offer of local law enforcement robots. Is that real?

Rowe: So Senator, one, I’ve been very transparent and forthcoming —

Hawley: Uh, the company has not been clear and forthcoming, but kindly, let’s not go there! &nbsp,

Rowe: I have been timely, lord. &nbsp,

Hawley: That remains to be seen. You’ve been on the work a few days. So much you’ve fired nothing. Today, the drones. Were you offered uavs? &nbsp,

Rowe: There was an offer to sail a device that day.

Hawley: Why did you refuse it? &nbsp,

Rowe: Uh, again, I think the potential of local law enforcement to provide an advantage we probably should have taken them up on them it… if it was offered. &nbsp,

” If it was offered”. The former Obama and Biden political appointee simply ca n’t accept what has already been admitted. &nbsp,

We do n’t know why the Secret Service turned it down, but, based on the results, it was the worst of a batch of bad answers, no?

Source credit