It is well known at this point that the Secret Service’s status has been greatly harmed by Donald Trump’s unsuccessful assassination attempt last month. Even they have acknowledged that it was a massive loss. But, in the days since Donald Trump narrowly escaped being killed, we’ve gotten a lot of smoke and mirrors from the Secret Service, as the company has been putting out false information to cover up what actually happened, and why a top 150 miles away from Trump, with great line-of-sight was n’t secured.
Advertisement
Although acting Director Ronald Rowe is no longer with the Secret Service and is genuinely interested in learning more about why and how the murder try took place, chairman Kimberly Cheatle may be gone.
The graph he gave to a mutual reading of the Senate Homeland Security and Judiciary Committees has raised questions in his new evidence to Congress.
Senator Chuck Grassley (R-IA ) sent Rowe a letter, accompanied by pictures, urging him to clarify his remarks, suggesting that Rowe lied during his testimony.
My analytical staff communicated with local law enforcement, including counter snipers who were present that day, as part of my continuing investigation into the intended assassination, according to Grassley in his notice. Local law enforcement disputes the position of the picture you gave in your testimony, claiming that the image neither exactly captures their line of sight and coverage area given their position in the building nor their physical placement there.
Associated:  , A Whistleblower Makes Scary New Claims About the Trump Assassination Try
Grassley continued,” Beaver County ESU have informed my team that Secret Service had never met with them on August 9th, 2024,” adding,” As of August 9, 2024, Beaver County ESU had told them that.” This kind of meet ought to be customary, even more so as soon as you take the oath to testify before Congress. Sadly, this adds to the communication problems that appear to be affecting the Secret Service in some way.
Advertisement
Grassley requests clarifications regarding the contradictory line of sight maps between Butler and the Secret Service.
Not everything in the Secret Service Acting Dir. It is important that Rowe lied or make false statements during the Senate hear. ( He also lied about not … pic. twitter.com/34TLmdM848
— Susan Crabtree ( @susancrabtree ) August 9, 2024
” The graph includes a small dark square, evidently labeled’ Beaver Sniper Line of Sight,'” explains Susan Crabtree at RealClearPolitics. The guns ‘ location is” shortly constrained between the AGR building’s location and the stage,” according to the statement,” and does not, pointlessly, cover any rooftop areas where Crooks ran across and then stopped open fire.”
Some insiders immediately identified the dark triangle’s claimed “line of sight” as being deliberately just constructed to show that local snipers never had any rooftop of the AGR building in their line of sight and were therefore not at fault for failing to observe that rooftop.  ,
” Either the dark matrix was drawn intentionally to avoid responsibility, or it does not contain any part of the roof by sheer crash”, one source told RealClearPolitics. ” Either way, no one had gaze on the]AGR] roof”.
A local police sniper should have had a much wider line of sight from his position, which might have helped him identify the assailant on the American Glass Research ( AGR ) rooftop during Trump’s rally, according to Crabtree. In other words, he would have seen Crooks, if he had correctly done his job, the publications argued.”
Advertisement
A more straightforward chart showing a direct line of sight, or view of the entire AGR top from where the native guns were positioned was released by acting Secret Service Director Rowe during his Senate evidence on Tuesday.  ,
When we were informed that the tower would be covered, why was the aggressor not visible? ” Rowe angrily demanded during his Tuesday testimony”. that our group leaders had met in person that evening after a face-to-face meeting. ”  ,
” This was the see,” Rowe said, pointing to a picture of the AGR property’s rooftop”. These were discussions that were had between the]Secret Service’s ] Pittsburgh Field Office, the local counterparts, and everyone supporting that visit that day. ”  ,
Did those accountable for the failing possibly tell us the truth?
