You will win some nations, and Allah will win your battles, but you should never give up fighting.
 ,  ,  ,  ,  ,  ,  ,  ,  ,  ,  ,  ,  ,  ,  ,  ,  ,  ,  ,  ,  ,  ,  ,  ,  ,  ,  ,  ,  ,  ,  ,  ,  ,  ,  ,  ,  , Sahih Bukhari ( Hadith ), MO20, 4712
Advertisement
He heard the sound of the horn, and took no warning, his heart shall remain upon him.
 ,  ,  ,  ,  ,  ,  ,  ,  ,  ,  ,  ,  ,  ,  ,  ,  ,  ,  ,  ,  ,  ,  ,  ,  ,  ,  ,  ,  ,  ,  ,  ,  ,  ,  ,  ,  ,  ,  ,  ,  ,  ,  ,  ,  ,  ,  , Ezekiel 33: 5
 , In End of the World: Society and Its Fate, scientist Jon Mills reflects on the Taliban assault with equipment guns and explosives on a school in Peshawar, in which 132 children were slaughtered. The work is about inexplicable. He writes that” the immediate disconnection of understanding any logical explanation for such atrocities is emotionally inexplicable because it undermines our psychological need for a social order in the universe.” It reflects our “pathological contravention” in our overt conviction that the world we live in is civilized. ” It takes just one work of barbarism”, he concludes,” to tell us that evil is no idea”. There is one world-historical belief system where such incidents are both required and determined, despite the fact that the one act of barbarism can be and is compounded exponentially every day.  ,
Any studying of the Koran, as Robert Spencer, Raymond Ibrahim, Ali Sina, Ibn Warrak, Rebecca Bynum, and a host of other excellent scholars make abundantly evident, did show verse after verse commanding acts of hideous violence against unbelievers. The compensation for the victims who have been slain in support to Allah will be peace, splendor, and girls with pear-shaped bosoms, as mentioned chiefly in Sura 44: 45-55 and 78: 31-36 of the Koran.
The Taliban killers claimed that their justification for carrying out such a vile and obscene work as retribution for the harm they had themselves unjustly suffered. What we are witnessing, nevertheless, is an expression of what Mills calls the “ethics of evil”, which is nothing less than” the rationale of self-righteousness while perpetrating terrible under the pretense of social superiority”. As noted, such an approach is legislated in the Koran. Both now and in the past, the barbarism that is associated with the belief is legend and legend.  ,
Advertisement
The concept is not broken by ISIS’s inner conflicts and televised crucifixions. Boko Haram’s hecatomb of innocent people in Nigeria is not a concept change. The rule does not apply to the attacks and death that occur in big cities around the world. There is no exception to the concept when there have been murders in secret in paper practices and musical performances. The more than 200, 000 evil episodes since 1970 are no exception to the law. The October 7 invasion of Hamas jihadists into Israel, the murder of over 1200 citizens, the burning and killing of children, the murder and death of young girls, the arrest and death of hostages, is Lahore many times over. A Hamas killer is glancing at his parents with his phone and exclaiming,” Look how many I killed with my own fingers!” Your brother killed Jews! Daughter, your son is a hero”, is another example of the compulsive violation in the plasm of individual desire. In the ayat, he is following and exulting: Capture him and bring him to Hell! Then pour his anguish over his head! ( Koran 44: 47, 48 ).
My reasoning is by no means special. Islam” spreads not by vision but by wars,” according to the great writer Jacob Burckhardt, in stark contrast to the two Abrahamic faiths. According to Gábor goston’s interesting record The Next Muslim Conquest: The Ottoman Empire and Its Wars in Europe, the first Muslim invasion dates from 633 A.D. and continues throughout Eastern and Western story. The militant and domestic hostility did not end with an empire; instead, it spread to many other nations, including America. ” The borders of Islam are bloody”, wrote Samuel Huntington, a fact which the political and historical registers have confirmed. And the justification for such brutal and impolite violence can be found right in the pages of the Koran and a lot of other literary works, including the Hadith, the Sirah, and the Sunnah, where the Prophet Muhammad’s life and teachings are found.
One would be wise to consult Ayaan Hirsi Ali’s Heretic: Why Islam Needs a Reformation Now, as one might do if one wanted to read the Koran for themselves in one of the many translations.  ,” Let me make my point in the simplest possible terms”, she writes,  ,” Islam , is not a religion of peace. Islamic violence is rooted not in social, economic, or political conditions—or even in theological error—but rather in the foundational texts of Islam itself”.
Advertisement
She continues,” It is foolish to insist that radical Islamists’ violent acts can be secluded from the religious ideals that inspire them,” as our leaders do frequently. Instead, we must acknowledge that they are driven by a political ideology, an ideology embedded in Islam itself”. There is neither space for temporization nor ignorance. Muslims who claim that their religion has been” stood” by extremists will simply not do so. The killers of IS and Boko Haram use the same sacred texts that every other Muslim in the world reveres as holy. There is no moderate or moderate Islam, according to Turkish President Recep Tayyip Erdogan. Islam is Islam and that’s it”. Islam is a reform-proof religion. Pretending otherwise would be like making up a fly for a floater for people with eye problems.  ,
However, the suffering of the Gazan population is now all that we hear about. We condemn Israel for defending their nation and attacking Hamas as if there were another option. Although their own scriptures advise the practice of taqiya or strategic lying when necessary, we agree with Hamas ‘ inflated statistics of civilian suffering as gospel. Students demonstrate at university campuses in support of a terrorist organization and the atrocities it commits, distinguishing themselves as much by their total ignorance of geography and history as by their decibel stridency. I have just received a circular from the Simon Wiesenthal Center copying an applauded speech of an imam in a local mosque, a short driving distance from my home:” O Allah, act with cruelty against the Jews, plundering Zionists, Christians, and those who aid them…Count them, kill them one by one”. This, of course, is pure hate speech, but it will be passed off as Islamic doctrinal exegesis. It’s in the Koran, after all.
It is a believable claim that the leaders of Gaza have abused and deceived people. It is a fauss to say that the Israelis have taken advantage of and deprived them. The problem, it has been said, is that this is a people several generations steeped in professional hate, self-proclaimed victimhood, and grifting leaders, so much so that no country—Middle East or otherwise—wants them. Except Canada. And that is why I write, not only as a grateful scion and beneficiary of Western civilization, but quite humbly as a Canadian. In an effort to encourage further rises in antisemitism, more divisive pro-Palestinian demonstrations, and even more dereliction of duty by the police and political officials, Prime Minister Justin Trudeau will import 5000 Gazans, according to the initiative, which will prevent them from being viewed as racist.
Advertisement
These people, it is obvious, are not likely to integrate into the culture or adhere to the principles that made Canada what it is or was. We can only anticipate resentment, tribal conflicts, sporadic violence, and a significant drain on the country’s resources and finances from the data provided by every Western country that has welcomed a growing Muslim cohort in its midst. It is a straightforward fact, with numerous historical examples, that tyranny and violence will always result from any country having a large enough minority or majority Muslim population. Expecting otherwise would be contrary to what reality consistently teaches. ( Unless, of course, such populations are regarded as reliable vote packers for the incumbent party. )
We note the stabbings, rapes, and physical attacks proliferating in European countries, in particular France, Germany and the U. K., that have opened their doors to the influx of what many people have come to regard as inferior cultures. On an empire, the sun is now setting, which, according to the slogan, never sets. It is a nation in the throes of demise. We note the tumult, foul play and escalating crime in Muslim-hosting countries like France and Sweden with their sharia courts, roaming gangs of groomers, thugs, rapists, and thieves, and proliferating no-go zones. We observe the” two-tier justice” being practiced by the authorities and their media scheming to protect the racial “guests” and refugees from the world’s borders from where they work. Totalitarian regimes that oppress their own citizens as perverse radicals are now being implemented by Western governments.  ,
Indeed, the” Regime” believes that ordinary white citizens and working-class people are the problem—not jihadists, Pakistani groomers, rampaging Muslim mobs, “undocumented” refugees, Palestinian demonstrators, or foreign criminal gangs. Heritage citizens are, apparently, the greatest threat to the status quo, purveyors of “disinformation”, by which the social and political elite mean what Steve Sailer in an important book has called” Noticing “—that is, seeing what is happening around one and to the culture by using common sense and honest observation.  ,
Advertisement
Thus, to say what you have noticed—and suffered—is to be guilty of disinformation, racism, bigotry or hate speech. To look the reality of immigrant and refugee violence in the face, to confront visibly corrupt two-tier policing, media duplicity, and Regime hypocrisy, and to describe it accurately is to be tarred by the state as a far-right extremist, a hooligan, a fascist or a white supremacist. You are undoubtedly a hater who needs to be isolated or expelled from a respectable society, but the real haters are those in power who despise their country, their fellow citizens of a conservative ideology ( also known as the “far right” ), their salt-of-the-earth traderspeople, and the principles of a democratic polity.
Nonetheless, objecting to Muslim-inspired violence destabilizing the democratic balance of Western nations, just as objecting to the wholesale importation of 5000 Gazans to swell Canada’s Muslim population, is a sensible and even patriotic act. Herb Pinder, a writer for the Western Standard, claims that there are already too many” Palestinian immigrants” illegally occupying public spaces and threatening our fellow Jew Canadians. Is it acceptable or smart to welcome those who soon demand outcomes potentially detrimental to historical Canadian political, democratic, religious, and economic values”? Pinder has no doubts that Trudeau’s most recent move “is an example of new immigrants importing issues from other countries into Canada.” Gaza issues are complex, perhaps even intractable, but should not play out with newcomers attacking ( sometimes even physically ) citizens of Canada” . ,
The West’s Islamic invasion and subjugation must no longer be accomplished through military conquest. A new tactic will be far more successful and can be accomplished with the complicity of Western leaders and intelligentsia, namely incremental immigration as documented in the Muslim Brotherhood’s Explanatory Memorandum—document 16 of which reads that” the civilizational-jihadist process…is a kind of grand jihad in eliminating and destroying the Western civilization from within and sabotaging its miserable house”, Pace Burckhardt, “mission” has replaced” conquest”. Novels like Jean Raspail’s The Camp of the Saints ( 1973 ) and Michael Houellebecq’s Submission ( 2015 ) are alarmingly premonitory. Their warnings are coming to pass with iron predictability.
Advertisement
Too many of us have embraced multiculturalism’s sedatives and platitudes, until a moment when we are abruptly aware and taken aback by an alien and unaccommodative presence that has been metastaticizing for decades while we voluntarily turned a blind eye. Our political leaders and media apparatchiks are completely conned by the impunity they have shown to betraying their own countries. We are reminded of Erica Chenoweth, a professor at the Harvard Kennedy School, who suggested the” 3.5 % Rule,” which states that only 3.5 % of a given population can start a revolution. Chenoweth is primarily concerned with civil unrest, but a small percentage of the population can start active and violent revolutions. The Bolshevik Revolution in Russia, for example, featured numbers that were statistically insignificant, yet brought into being one of the most monstrous regimes in history, which lasted for over 70 years.  ,
According to verifiable census figures, Muslims make up 6 percent of the population in England, approximately 7 percent in Germany, 10 percent in France, 8.1 percent in Sweden and 4.9 percent in Canada. In his book Slavery, Terrorism and Islam, Peter Hammond surveyed about 50 nations across four continents. He notes that 10 % of the census represents the point at which societies start to crumble and countries lose their national identity, but that 6 percent, as noted, is more than adequate for the task. We appear to be interiorizing the Umar Pact’s promise to” we shall open our gates.” All Muslims will receive board and lodging from us.  ,
The writing is on the wall. The epicenter of naivety is to believe that social upheaval and a radical overthrow of both the state apparatus and cultural norms cannot occur here. It is happening as we speak, in Europe and in my own country, as the demographic incursion continues. It is only fair to say that Mark Miller, Canada’s immigration minister, has placed a two-year seal on international students and placed the first-ever temporary immigration ban in response to public pressure against uncapped immigration policies and the damaging effects of ever-surging levels. The government also intends to pursue a “regularization program to grant status to undocumented residents,” which is a significant but, and has not made any efforts to reduce Muslim immigration. The new” suite of measures” is largely cosmetic.
Advertisement
If our prime minister is aware of his actions, I wonder. I fear that he does.  ,