Britain Is Now a Totalitarian State

We may safely consider, without exaggeration or exaggeration, that Britain is now a totalitarian position. Not because it’s not impossible, but the ruling class still has the same level of total power as Stalin did. Anyone who pays attention to the American government’s violent Chicken Little reaction to the rioting from this past week will be able to see that it holds no regard for American principles like freedom of speech and freedom of conscience.

Here’s a video of an elderly man being arrested in his home for “improper use” of social media for” some comments that ]he ] made” on his Facebook page. The two Stasi criminals are working for a state that recently declared that” only after purchases” was not a justification for human rights violations. And however…

This is where Britain is now, and if there’s a definition for it other than” totalitarian”, I’m open for suggestions.

The British government’s campaign to demonize all expressions of state ideology did n’t just start this week. A Muslim community in Enfield was detained in February 2019 for practicing Christian preaching. Two men were detained in north London in February 2021 after handing out flyers promoting COVID vaccinations. A person was detained in Birmingham in March 2023 after silently praying outside an abortion office.

But Metropolitan Police Commissioner Sir Mark Rowley, who thinks condemnation of mass immigration equates “hate” and “terrorism”, had no reservations about letting&nbsp, a pro-Hamas protest march through London after the 10/7 episodes last season, and on Armistice Day no less.

Hannah Arendt may not carefully classify the dictatorial drive the European ruling class is pursuing as authoritarian. This is because none of the typical totalitarian movements ( communism, socialism, fascism, Nazism, and Islamism ) are suicidal in nature. Each of these motions makes an attempt to either use the position to advance the philosophy or to undermine it through the use of the ideology. &nbsp,

But the English authoritarian state is different. Its purpose is to bolster the philosophy while weakening the English position. I doubt yet its supporters had evidently explain it to curious heads. What defines the parameters of that philosophy is up to anyone. It appears to be a conflicting synthesis of the managed decline of both federal regeneration and regional will, which is the result of each of the preceding factors, pseudo-Marxism, maid statism, multiculturalism, and the result of each of these factors.

In other words, we now have a fresh tyranny with a new philosophy, one based not on group, culture, society, or church. Or more, at least no its own. It’s more of an intellectual vacuum, hedonistic in nature, and its aim is the purposeful dissolution of itself.

Hitler was n’t an Austrian who believed in Jewish supremacy. Stalin was n’t a poor who believed in the law of the elite. Mussolini was n’t an Italian who believed in the Albanian Empire. However, the American Left uses the state’s influence to sabotage it, just like it does for all American Leftists. They’re jealous they lost the Great Game, and they want to remove the winner out of despite. They do n’t care which “group” or” class” arises from the ashes, so long as it’s not anything you’d recognize as British.

The American protesters have been deemed “far-right” by the state equipment, and you know what that means. This will result in the position being relentless and ruthless in its pursuit of each and every one of them and prosecuting them to the fullest extent possible for any arbitrary characterization used to bend and bend the laws in this week. Their offense is not violence. Their offense is abhorring condition ideology. The J6 plaintiffs could provide them with legal counsel.

An honest media may accurately describe the violent and violent acts that are regularly carried out by organized groups that are “far-left” or” Islamist,” but our palace eunuchs instead refer to them as “mostly peaceful.” Kamala Harris could launch a fund to rescue the American rioters if they had waved a few Palestinian flags. &nbsp,

The authoritarian attitude is nothing more than a global outlook, much like Trotsky and Trotsky were dispatched by Stalin to Mexico or by a Moroccan torn down by Theo van Gogh on Amsterdam’s streets. American virtue indicating may not interest you, but it does. Elon Musk, an American member living in the United States and protected by the American Bill of Rights, is now facing legal action in the UK for his comments on Facebook.

What heinous acts did Elon undertake that raise the possibility of an extradition demand? According to that annoying communist rags, the U. K. Independent, he “launched a diatribe” on his system X against Prime Minister Keir Starmer.

ELON LAUNCHED A TIRADE!! !

But that’s not all. He used his system to”… attack Sir Keir privately..”.

ELON MADE A PERSONAL ATTACK!! !

“… as he appeared to fan the flames of discontent..”.

ELON FANNED THE FLAMES!! !

… in an “apparently unwarranted attack on Starmer and the British government”…

FIRST A PERSONAL ATTACK, Today AN UNPROVOKED ATTACK!! !

As far as “unprovoked attacks” go, there seem to be a lot of them going around in the West nowadays, do n’t there? Any number of American girls, French priests, French performers, and Florida gays may attest to that. Oddly, the only “unprovoked assault” that American authorities are concerned about was the one that was fully verbal and safe.

Politico reports that Musk” had been summoned for a grilling by American Members” for his “abusive” information.

SUMMONED FOR A GRILLING!!! Elon may become gnawing on his fingertips straight down.

Elon must answer for his actions in front of Parliament, according to two Employment MPs. Um… Mr. Musk may get your area if he wanted to. And the starting cost is undoubtedly relatively low based on how easily it’s already going to Muslim refugees without any real get.

The Brits made sure to state that they mean you also, so let’s not misunderstanding their threats to Musk for some self-serving nonsense. American government prosecutor Stephen Parkinson&nbsp, threatened&nbsp, social media influencers globally for “playing a part in the harsh problem”, yapping that they “must realize that they are not secure and there is nowhere to hide”. Continuing, he said,” Some folks are worldwide. That does n’t mean they’re safe”. He continued that” we had definitely consider repatriation” if he deemed English laws had been broken.

According to the police commissioner who aforementioned, Sir Mark Rowley&nbsp, they will arrest you if you post commentary online that does n’t comply with British law, regardless of whether you are in England or “further afield online.” When asked if this meant that American citizens would be detained in other nations, he responded,” Being a keyboard hero does not render you protected from the law.”

You wo n’t go after me for criticizing Pakistani Muslims on the other side of the planet because you wo n’t protect your own grade school girls from being raped by organized gangs of Pakistanis in your own country, which even Al-Jazeera&nbsp opposed, but you do. Are you capable of sorrow? Do you look like a little gentleman? You sniveling, bootlicking, mundane, dull cog in the system.

Not that I’m worried that you’ll always arrive and take me to the jail. That’s right, Sir Mark Rowley, your mountain is being called by Commoner C. A. Skeet. Put down your drink and come get me, you wanker. What location do you prefer to meet? Lexington? Concord? Yorktown?

You don’t see unrest? Consider attempting to evict a citizen of the United States for exercising one of their First Amendment right. Next you’ll see unrest. Good luck getting back to the airport. As you well know, we also have other revisions…

A frightened, anxious totalitarianisme that disregards itself is at the core of the issue. No one else will esteem it both. The traditional authoritarian regimes used brute force to impose themselves. Everyone but the American press understood that their intellectual justifications were just slurs for the Western press.

If Britain were n’t but haughty, the idea that they could push a sovereign nation to apprehend one of their own for a crime that was entirely legitimate in that country would be absurd. Britain was n’t pressure Fiji to give people away, and they think it’s gonna happen in America?

Keir, Rowley, and their kind want the anxiety and trembling that the likes of Mao and Castro were able to put, but they lack the appearance, the potential, and the trust. Because no one was intimidated by his abuse attempts, Rowley specifically comes across as a bodybuilder to be feared, rather than a playground child who snickers as the older, bigger kids do.

Or Jimminy Cricket waging his hand at Lampwick while huffing and puffing.

Or resolutely fleeing without help.

Gosh, there are just so many idioms.

Britain has therefore become a autocratic, and in a way that poses a real danger to everyone but itself. A majority of American subjects, as Rick Moran pointed out on these webpages, seem to be enthusiastic about giving their self-declared betters free speech. And just imagine how their ancestors helped usher in the Third Reich’s battle, halted the terrible French Revolution, and left us with the Magna Carta. And presently they’re willing to serve as slaves in the castle. Simply put, it’s unfortunate.

Source credit