Kamala Harris and the Modern Democratic Party: Anti-Semantics Covering for Anti-Semitics

Political campaigns demand funds. Globs and handfuls of cash. In 2024 alone, the total spending on American elections is projected to reach$ 15.9 billion ($ 17.1 billion if you also include direct mail ). But most of us already knew that votes were n’t low.

What most do n’t realize, however, is that money is n’t nearly enough. Not even close! An infantry of grassroots activism is also necessary for social activities.

As much as possible.

Funds can be analogized to an underwater assault: With big ad-buys, you may blanket the radio with commercials. Every business split will be greeted with your face and message, and every YouTube video will be christened by your campaign spots. The quickest way to reach the most people is with cash.

Its power is its air combat. &nbsp,

Its weakness, however, is that it does n’t address your ground game.

One still needs to push on your neighbors ‘ doors. Make phone calls. Stick signs on telephone poles at 3: 00 a. m. ( while evading cops ). Wave, cry, and make noises at campaign demonstrations. Male the polls on election time. Disseminate brochures, spread bumper tags, and put grassroots energy into the plan.

Ground and air, you need both.

This is the Democrat Party’s present problem: Their donor base supports Israel, their local foundation supports Hamas. &nbsp,

There is no middle earth. And it’s ALL coming to a brain in Chicago.

Despite these heavy, unbreakable divisions, it is amazing how successfully the Democrats managed to maintain the appearance of unity. If anything, Biden’s deposition this late in the campaign cycle and their new nominee, the Dear Leader, being elected rather than elected, should have caused those fault lines to swell and tremble beneath their feet, causing a devastating earthquake ( which they’d likely responsible on climate change ). But the Democrats had a president passport: Donald J. Trump. The injuries and fractures were concealed by their compulsive concern of the Scary Orange Boogeyman. &nbsp,

Until today.

If this were the GOP, the press would’ve pounded the Hamas-Israel separate 24/7, hammering every one Republican candidate to “pick a edge” and elevating the matter to the forefront. It would be the first ( and final ) query they would ask at each press conference and the opening phrase of each news segment. And I’m certain you can imagine the tale:

” Why wo n’t you condemn antisemitism?! Are you too obedient to face criticism? Are you so morally repugnant, you’d prioritize winning an election (tsk, tsk ) ahead of stopping hatred, racism, and bigotry?! Have you no guilt”? !&nbsp,

And the Republicans, being innocent and ignorant about media relations, would undoubtedly begin sniping at one additional. Just a little back-and-forth — even a few back-and-forth at first — but that’s all the media would need to start a fire.

Later, in terms of total protection, it would be a top-five problem in the election.

The Democrats do n’t play by the same rules as Republicans, so their threat does n’t come from the outside. The internet plays the role of fire for the horses, putting out flames and shielding them from arsonists, instead of starting fires. So, there wo n’t be any media pressure…

Until it is received by them.

Which means that Kamala Harris ‘ popularity and support, as well as his appreciation for Joe Biden’s selflessness ( he saved democracy, you know ), will continue to be the main themes of the Democratic National Convention. ), the philosophical problems of Donald Trump, and the sun of a fresh, beautiful creation of Democratic leaders. Are n’t you excited?! ( I know, I know. There’s still time to buy extra Pepto. )

It’s all prewritten. Only one side is disrupt this tale, and it’s definitely not the Republicans.

The game is in the activists ‘ court.

But if you’re a pro-Hamas admirer, you’ve got to get absolutely, positively, hummus-spitting angry right now. Donor dollars are waaay more important than grassroots support when you’re still months away from the election because the Democrats have depowered you because they do n’t need you! But, at every turn in 2024, the Democratic Party leadership has given the donors precedence over the protesters.

Certain, they got a small lip service ( and a handy dance/convulsion from AOC), but they’ve lost every struggle, conflict, and conflict that matters. ( Kinda like Hamas. ) They’ve become the Washington Commanders of public scheme. They are aware that they have only one more chance to win in the next 48 days. There wo n’t be a platform for liberal activism like the DNC when it comes to an end. It’s now or never.

The wise income is in the right now.

And take into account the fact that if you’re a supporter of a brutal terrorist business and really believe their actions are morally righteous, you have a lot of latitude for carnage and panic at the DNC. If it’s morally permissible to death civilians, remove babies, kidnap grandmas, and rape much girls… next anything goes in Chicago.

The pro-Hamas part did force. It’ll be unpleasant. And then — finally — the public’s gears will begin to crush … and once they start, it’s almost impossible to stop the speed.

There will be DNC fallout, replete with finger-wagging, name-calling, and ( of course ) Jew-blaming. Do you support Israel, or do you support Hamas, or will Kamala Harris find herself in the awkward, uncomfortable position of having to commit to a policy she ca n’t word-salad out of? It’s a linear decision.

Or does she succumb to her word-salad foundations, choke on a crouton, and say there were “very good people on both sides”?

Getcha snacks ready, according to the great American scientist Terrell Owens ( no reference to Candace Owens ):

FOX Business recently ran a section about Kamala Harris and the Democrats ‘ bait-and-switch wordplay, entitled” The Semantics Game is a Trap”. Also, by explanation,” language” refers to the meaning and reasoning of language. What if we call a candidate who purposefully obscures the meanings of words in order to protect pro-Hamas haters? &nbsp,

This is a novel one, individuals: We now have anti-semantics covering for anti-Semitics.

Source credit