Nobody who is betting on Kamala Harris winning in November makes even the slightest effort to consider her as a political member. She’s no one because she has no reason to run for president, no perspective, no interest in the job.
The whole point of this herculean, gravity-defying exercise we’re in the midst of is n’t to make Kamala president. It’s to dispute Donald Trump the White House. The only thing that can occur is Kamala’s election meddling in ways that were once impenetrable.
We’re now seeing it with unbelievable poll numbers ( absolutely, no one can describe them ), a nationwide media outlet that went from acknowledging Kamala as a permanent screw-up to heralding her as a beauty queen, and an all-hands cleanup effort to rediscover her reputation from certainly helpless to Barack Obama redux.
Liberals and the media will pretend Kamala’s last three uncomfortable years in office previously happened by lying about anything and everything from now on, to a degree that is in no way tied to reality.
Once-great New York Times columnist Thomas Edsall this year asked a bunch of “historians” and “experts” at Yale, Harvard, Princeton, and the like to foresee a second Trump presidency. The end result was a violent, immovable stream of high school wannabe writers ‘ fanfiction posts on online forums at 3 a.m.
According to Sean Wilentz, a professor at Princeton,” Trumpian arrogance and the cultish MAGA border have become an article of faith from the top to the bottom within the completely transformed Republican Party, which Trump completely commands.”
Laurence Tribe, Harvard:” All the dangers foreign and domestic posed by Trump’s brutally cruel, self-aggrandizing, socially unrestrained, reality-defying figure … would become magnified many times over in any succeeding term”.
Timothy Synder, Yale:” Republic depends upon case, and Trump sets the worst conceivable one. He has publicly admired rulers his whole life. He may encourage Xi and Putin”.
These are the people who proudly back a Democratic nominee who was installed in a grisly coup and is currently employed by a government that is purportedly using the Justice Department to eliminate its main political opposition. Or, as the remaining calls this conduct,” the struggle for democracy”.
Trump “would promote Xi and Putin,” Kamala as vice president watched China fly a detective bubble across the entire US while Russia invaded a sovereign nation. Trump is “vindictive” while Kamala sits at the top of an management that, for the first time in American history, criminally charged a former senator. Trump supporters are” cultish,” whereas Kamala’s party opted to vote for the winner without taking into account dissenting views.
Liberals in positions of authority and prestige did say something, at the cost of their trust, to create this election work for them. Their reputations do n’t matter to them, so long as they win.
Kamala just proposed a “ban on price gouging”, which is another way of saying “price controls”, which is another way of saying” socialism”. Every reputable scholar, whether on the left or right, declares that it is a terrible thought or at least acknowledges that it will cause widespread shortages.
Another poll treatment required. Emily Peck, an expert on price gouging, wrote on Tuesday that Kamala had n’t actually provided a formal policy on the ban, but that those fears about shortages are” just not how anti-price gouging policies work in the U.S. S”. According to Paul Krugman of the Times, Kamala “in actuality” meant “legislation prohibiting price gouging on shopping.” And while Krugman is opposed to nearly every popular suggestion Trump has made, he argued that, in this situation,” just because something is popular does n’t mean that it’s a bad idea.”
Upward is over. Wet is clean. Kamala is taken seriously.
You have n’t seen anything yet. Kamala’s vote meddling is going to get even worse. She ca n’t possibly win without it.
