The 2023-2024 battle time is not just the strangest on record, it’s also probably the most anti-democratic.
Over the past ten years, the Democratic Party has allegedly asserted that the state is still in perilous and philosophical risk.
Advertisement
After that claim, a number of anti-democratic strategies were used to thwart his first two presidential campaigns, his presidency, and presently his third and final attempt at winning the presidency.
A close generation before, we witnessed the 2015-2016 Hillary Clinton/Democratic National Committee/FBI-assisted efforts to plant the false claim of Trump-Russian cooperation to thread the 2016 election.
The Trump 2016 campaign was severely hampered by the dishonest Steele dossier, which was the focus of that ploy. That hoax had eventually alter 22 months of his presidency before being shown to be a fantasy.
On the day of the 2020 election, the remaining following birthed the Russian computer disinformation campaign. A national debate was likewise ruined by the false accusations that Hunter Biden’s own incriminating laptop was once more the property of Russians trying to ally himself with Trump.
Those strange work continued during the Biden management.
For the first time in history, the allies of one battle sought to inspire some 16 states to attempt to remove a significant group’s good nominee from their key and general election ballots.
The intention was to strangle a Trump second presidential bid in its early stages and, once more, stop the electorate from backing him.
Almost instantly, four national, state, and local prosecutors filed lots of criminal charges against Trump.
Advertisement
They all shared some peculiar connections.
If Trump had not run for office, these accusations may most likely not had been filed. If Trump had not been a contentious traditional Democrat seeking reelection, none of them may have gone ahead.
Nearly all of the allegations against any other former candidates were private citizens, and often not filed.
Several of them could just as readily have been filed against Joe Biden and his brother.
Some charges and beliefs may also achieve their objectives of bankrupting, jailing, or keeping Trump inanimate during the last days of the plan.
One of the Georgia lawyers had secret meetings with the White House lawyers for Biden.
Biden himself, on the day of the national attorney Jack Smith’s prosecution, all but declared his campaign foe Trump innocent.
Smith had even met personally and quietly with Biden’s White House key.
In an unparalleled style, Smith rushed his trial to maintain it synchronized with the 2024 strategy.
If the special counsel in that case had no alleged that he could not persuade a judge to indict a guilty but mentally challenged Biden, similar national expenses might have just as easily resulted in his prosecution.
Unseen, another Biden attorney abruptly quit his top placement at the Justice Department to meet the Manhattan staff led by Alvin Bragg.
Advertisement
However, Trump had survived cooperation, deception, de-balloting, lawfare, and a subsequent death attempt to wave way ahead of Biden in the June political polls.
Democratic donors and senior politicians forced a stress-test presidential debate prior to either candidate’s even nomination at their respective conventions as a result of Biden’s poll collapse.
When Biden imploded in the debate, a supposedly once-fit president was suddenly declared impaired. Additionally, a previously uninspiring Vice President, Kamala Harris, was abruptly transformed into a formidable replacement candidate.
In order to avoid a Democrat’s threat of removal from his final five months in office, Biden was forced to withdraw from the race.
Nearly 15 million voters ‘ primary votes were abruptly overturned.
Harris was suddenly chosen as the new Biden-replacement candidate without a contest or vote at the convention. He had neither primary nor delegate victories.
The donor-politico class further decided that, like a challenged Biden in 2024, Harris could not be allowed to hold press conferences. Given that she was concerned that her candidacy might be threatened by her obvious obligations, she would only conduct live interviews, unscripted town halls, or other venues.
Advertisement
So the Party that declared democracy to be dead in the shadows now favors the shadows as a means of gaining and keeping power, whether by ignoring primary voters, open conventions, or transparent venues with the voters.
Add to the ten years of purchased collusion, two unprecedented impeachments, a disinformation hoax, attempts to de-ballot Trump, the forced removal of an unpopular but unwilling President Biden from the Democratic ticket, the virtual anointing of Harris by fiat in his place, and the ongoing collusion with a compliant media to avert public scrutiny and cross-examination of Harris.
And the conclusion?
Have those who taught us about democracy in danger now made the decision to save it by destroying it?
