Kamala Harris ‘ acceptance speech is hailed by some as” the best acceptance speech ever,” according to those on the left. Basically, it was a wonderful example of speaking a bit and saying nothing.
Advertisement
This vote is not about problems. It’s actually about everything if you pay attention to what the Democrats are saying. Harris and the Democrats do n’t dare run on issues. So Harris’s managers ( with an help, no doubt from Barack Obama ) have gone “hope and shift” one better with “optimism and joy”.
It’s a winter career, of course. However, it does a damn efficient work of snowmobiling. Donald Trump and the Republicans ignore this fresh energetic at their own risk.  ,
The most enthusiastic candidate wins the election, according to a truism in American politics. It’s not always accurate. However, it’s true that most individuals try to create optimism regardless of what the reality is frequently.
Jimmy Carter’s primary contest in 1976 was all about positivity and “moving on” from Watergate and the Nixon withdrawal. Ronald Reagan’s 1980 battle was all about regaining Americans ‘ cheerful heart. Bill Clinton’s 1992 campaign was about moving on from Reagan-Bush and climbing out of the minor crisis of that year. Barack Obama’s 2008 plan of “hope and shift” was the concept of enthusiasm.
Trump’s campaign has to have a dramatic change in order to achieve its gloomy elements of what would occur under the additional four years of Biden. My prediction is that Trump did vehemently oppose Harris ‘ fake internet saga while reiterating the country’s history before COVID.
Advertisement
Trump had a clear advantage as long as this was a contest about replacing Joe Biden and his abominable plans. However, Biden has been replaced by a brand-new member who resembles our current evil president, who is no longer there.  ,
This is not Harris, who became the victim of the social world due to her jumbled language and stammering attempts to explain herself. This is serene, great, collected Kamala. Gone is the joke track. Then, she’s a really significant people. She still does n’t have any ideas worth discussing, and the ideas she’s presented have been so rancid she’s already dropped them down the memory hole ( Prince controls? Actually? ).
Her popularity speech included a good dose of lies and fabrications about Trump, along with timeless deflection.
A politician poses a significant risk by combining offensive and defensive politicians in one statement. This product was the nature of Bill Clinton’s and Barack Obama’s victory. At crucial points in 2016, Hillary Rodham Clinton was unable to do it. And despite his success in 2020, Democrats came to the conclusion that it was impossible to imagine an aging Biden doing in 2024.
After Harris ‘ talk, there is no denying that Trump and his strategy are aware of how much the plan has changed as a result of their thinking.
Advertisement
What do citizens like? Harris and Trump’s efforts are combing through a large amount of data to understand the lingo in voters ‘ heads. When it was a Trump-Biden competition, the majority of voters wanted a distinct game.  ,
Then they’ve got one. Does it make a difference? Trump’s numbers are near to being set in stone. Trump did not receive less than 45 % of the ballot, no matter how much the media tries to support him. Harris is definitely on the same surface as him.
But Harris is in a better position to utilize the “optimism” design. Did that make a difference? It very likely would, according to history.  ,
