Arizona’s 15 districts are refusing to conduct required processes to ensure international citizens are removed from the voter rolls, an “amended” lawsuit filed Tuesday alleges.
The legal challenge, filed on behalf of the Strong Communities Foundation of Arizona and native Yvonne Cahill, alleges that the Grand Canyon State’s 15 election devices “have not taken the steps required by law to ensure that international people are removed from their voting spins.” America First Legal ( AFL ), a law firm led by former assistant attorney general of Arizona, and Jennifer Wright, the plaintiff, represent the plaintiffs.
The defendants are held accountable for their errors, and the lawsuit seeks to restore public confidence in the state’s democratic system, according to the filing.
According to a media release from AFL regarding the petition, Tuesday’s issue is an “amended” edition of a complaint filed against Maricopa County Recorder Stephen Richer early next month.
Plaintiffs also alleged that Richer “ignored” his constitutionally mandated commitment to “ensure” the removal of noncitizens from the locality’s voting spins. The Maricopa County Recorder’s Office “prioritizes and prides itself on maintaining correct, up-date voting rolls,” according to a member from Richer’s business, and” will continue to follow the letter of the law.”
Richer’s company did not respond to The Federalist’s request for comment on Wednesday.
The “amended” problem adds Arizona’s 14 different county recorders as plaintiffs in the match.
The entire saga seemingly began in July, when AFL sent , a href=”https://aflegal.org/america-first-legal-sends-legal-demand-letter-to-all-15-arizona-counties-threatening-legal-action-if-they-do-not-take-action-to-stop-illegal-aliens-from-voting/” target=”_blank” rel=”noreferrer noopener”>letter“ to all 15 of Arizona’s county recorders”  , demanding” that the recorders immediately start using existing federal law to verify the citizenship of all of Arizona’s federal-only voters”. In Arizona, individuals who do not provide documentary proof of citizenship ( DPOC ) when registering to vote are  , permitted , to do so as” Federal-Only Voters” and cast ballots in federal elections. That income is due to a 2013 U. S. Supreme Court ruling known as , Arizona v. Inter Tribal Council of Ariz., Inc.
Yet, state law requires that individuals provide DPOC when registering using a express voter registration form. The U.S. Supreme Court recently upheld that condition.
Plaintiffs contend that Arizona’s 15 devices have not followed the correct procedures for maintaining the voter lists in accordance with the law to ensure that foreigners are removed from the rolls and that Arizona’s elections are secured.
Any unusual resident who is registered to vote is ineligible, the lawsuit claims.” Any foreign resident who is registered to vote is unlawful for foreign citizens to vote in national primaries.” Federal law mandates that county devices “perform record repair” and make “reasonable efforts” to make sure that foreigners are not registered to vote.
Plaintiffs have requested that the government’s recorders be required to follow the state’s laws and that the U.S. District Court for the District of Arizona uphold the state’s current voting listing maintenance laws.
Solid Societies Foundati… by The Federalist
Shawn Fleetwood is a University of Mary Washington student and a team author for The Federalist. He previously served as a condition content writer for Agreement of States Action and his work has been featured in various stores, including RealClearPolitics, RealClear Health, and Conservative Review. Following him on Twitter @ShawnFleetwood
