I do n’t believe it is beneficial to simply say what people want to hear. The fact matters. And it turns out that Donald Trump’s debate on Tuesday night was n’t very good. He took the fish every day Kamala baited him, even though he did little to no pre-debate preparation.
Advertisement
It goes without saying that Kamala Harris lied her way through the debate, but the moderators did n’t fact-check her once, yet Trump was “fact-checked” between five and seven times— and the fact-checks were n’t always accurate.
Perhaps because of what I do for a living, I’m more important of Donald Trump’s efficiency. I’ve been highlighting in the discussion for days, and it was absolutely unpleasant to see him miss every opportunity. However, a Reuters report claimed that he generally attracted undecided voters after the debate.  ,
Kamala Harris was widely regarded as having won the national debate on Tuesday against Republican incumbent Donald Trump, but a select group of skeptical electors remained sceptical that the Democratic vice chairman was the better choice, according to the store.
Before and after the conversation, Reuters spoke with ten confused citizens. Six of them shifted toward supporting Trump, three leaned toward Harris, and one remained questionable. That’s a more reliable outcome for Trump.
The messages suggested Harris might need to create more thorough policy recommendations to get over voters who have yet to make up their minds, according to Reuters.
It gets worse for Kamala.
Five of the participants in the more than 90-minute discussion on how she would improve the U.S. economy and address the high cost of living, which is a major concern for voters, found Harris obscure.
A trip New York Times/Siena College opinion poll found that more than a third of good citizens felt they did not know much about her, in contrast to the well-known Trump, making the face especially significant for Harris.
Even though all said they did not enjoy Trump as a man, the Trump turns said they had more faith in him on the market. They claimed that during his presidency between 2017 and 2021, their personal economic condition had improved. Some praised his suggestion to levy foreign goods, despite the fact that economists believe that would probably cause prices to rise.
Four of those six claimed that Harris failed to persuade them that she would undertake various monetary policies than Democrat President Joe Biden, a Democrat who they generally blamed for the high cost of living.
” I still do n’t know what she is for”, said Mark Kadish, 61, an entrepreneur in Florida. Her ideas were not entirely fleshed out, she claimed.
Six of the citizens are men, eight are bright, and two are ebony, while four are women. In the past, everyone voted for both Republican and Democratic prospects.
[…]
Robert Wheeler, 48, a security company administrative in Nevada, was leaning toward Harris before the conversation. He then asserts that if the election were later, he would support Trump, primarily because he believed Harris had not given clear instructions on her plans.
” I thought Kamala Harris was telling me why not to voting for Donald Trump rather than why she’s the appropriate candidate,” Wheeler said.
Advertisement
I’m hardly gonna lie, this effect surprises me. If this example is representative of a larger pattern, then Donald Trump actually succeeded in doing what he needed to do, even though my idea was that this conversation probably would n’t likely change the needle a lot, if at all.
Past: Five Restaurants From the Trump-Harris Discussion
Of training, some may point to several elections saying that Kamala won the debate. Although it may be true, winning a argument does not always mean winning over citizens. I ca n’t recall a time when the media did n’t push the idea that Trump lost a debate, aside from Joe Biden’s debate in June. They claim that he lost both his 2016 and 2020 conversations to Joe Biden. Maybe winning the argument is n’t the outcome candidates should be aiming for. Maybe the real objective is to win over undecided voters. And if this Reuters review is any indicator, Trump achieved that.
