The figures are in, and they’re great.
After the University of North Carolina system’s Board of Governors voted in May to reform DEI offices and plans on each of its 17 campuses, the group received a report on the state of affairs on campuses on Wednesday.
In the months since, 59 DEI jobs have been eliminated, another 132 jobs have been realigned, and the system as a whole has saved more than$ 17 million dollars, according to a report compiled for the board.
” Some people will say that the schools were overused. Some will argue that the schools did n’t go far enough, according to UNC system general counsel Andrew Tripp, who added that” there still exists variation in exactly how colleges interpreted and implemented the policy,” despite there not appear to be any additional practices or administrative functions dedicated to DEI.
The Observer reported:
]S] everal schools, including UNC-Chapel Hill, have closed their La practices and eliminated many employment opportunities within them. But other schools, including NC State University, renamed and reorganized their practices, usually removing words such as “diversity” from their names but keeping different elements of the units alive.
…Tripp told the committee that differences in the number of La efforts they’ve originally offered may be to blame for some of the variation in the schools ‘ changes.
” The larger colleges had more work to do”, Tripp said. ” The smaller colleges, less so, but there was plenty of work to be done”.
UNC-Chapel Hill eliminated considerably more positions than any other university, at 20, and reported the most” savings” at more than$ 5.3 million. The next-most was at UNC Charlotte, with nine posts eliminated.
At UNC-Chapel Hill, the country’s premier school, “programs originally in the office have been sourced to various sections”, the Daily Tar Heel reported.
Officials of students have expressed worry about the modifications.
According to Chief of Staff to the Student Body President Nigel Parker,” I find it very sad that the overall diversity of our incoming group of Tar Heels, along with the remainder of Carolina, may be better off without an company dedicated to making all students feel that they belong,” in the midst of major declines in the overall diversity of the student body.
” I think this is a result of the general politicization of higher education that has influenced our public discourse on the subject, and that UNC’s decision will have an impact on the quality of life for students who are becoming increasingly underrepresented.”
IMAGE: University of North Carolina system
Follow The College Fix on Twitter and Like us on Facebook.
