It’s looking more and more like whoever wins Pennsylvania’s 19 electoral vote may win the presidency. That’s not an understatement. Pennsylvania is the gateway to 270 electoral vote and win for both candidates. The Keystone State’s election campaign will become much more difficult and doubtful if Trump or Harris lose.
Advertisement
Pennsylvania is a position that’s equally split. In 2016, Donald Trump won by less than a percentage point. Trump lost Pennsylvania by a little more than one percent point in 2020. The 2024 voting is expected to be just as nearby.
The difference between success and defeat can be determined by a few thousand seats. And that’s why Kamala Harris made a major league switch on the subject of mechanical fracturing or drilling. There are 123, 000 Colonists working in corporations connected to the procedure. Pennsylvania has embraced drilling.  ,
And yet, as Forbes notes, In a 2019 CNN weather town house as a political member, Harris said” There’s no question I’m in favor of banning fracking”.
Harris had already departed from that place by the time of her 2020 controversy with Vice President Mike Pence, claiming that as a result, she had become increasingly opposed to fracking.
Then, in 2024, she’s a born-again fossil fuel fighter.
” Let’s talk about drilling because we’re around in Pennsylvania”, she said during the conversation in Philadelphia on Tuesday night. ” I made that extremely clear in 2020. I did not ban drilling. In my capacity as evil president of the United States, I have never outlawed drilling. I believe that we need to make investments in various energy sources to decrease our dependence on foreign oil.
The legislator who embraced Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez’s (D-N. Y. ) half-trillion-dollar” Green New Deal” is presently a cheer for drilling and fossil fuels.
Advertisement
In addition to the more than 123, 000 jobs hydraulic fracturing—known informally as fracking—supports in Pennsylvania, the association’s study, based on calendar year 2022, found that this form of fossil fuel exploration creates$ 41.4 billion in annual economic activity, contributes$ 24.4 billion to the commonwealth’s Gross Domestic Product, pays out$ 12 billion in wages, and generates$ 3.2 billion in state and local tax revenues. These numbers have no drastically changed over the past two years, according to The Marcellus Shale Coalition.” In order to have the possibility of moving any moderate Republicans and many independents to vote for her ,]Harris ] had to come to peace with the issue of fracking”, Jeff Brauer, a political science professor at Keystone College, near Scranton, Pennsylvania, told Dispatch Politics. ” In Pennsylvania, where the competition is going to be so extremely tight in November, an issue like drilling could be the change”.
” She did not allow drilling in Pennsylvania. If she won the election, fracking in Pennsylvania will close on time one”, Trump said during the conversation, rebutting Harris. ” If she won the election, the day after that election, they’ll go back to destroying our nation and oil may be dead, fossil fuel will be useless. We’ll return to renewable and windmills, where they need to have some energy out of the entire plain.
The extreme weather change advocates who are deeply disappointed in her should be asked whether it matters that she has vehemently opposed fracking.
Advertisement
Stevie O’Hanlon, a spokesperson for the Sunrise Movement, one of the organizations behind the Green New Deal, claimed that Harris spent more time advocating for fracking than crafting a strong vision for a fresh strength potential. ” Fresh voters want more from Harris ” on climate change, she added”. We want to observe a real plan that addresses the intensity and level of this turmoil. ‘
Trump’s strategy in trying to spot Harris on the shale issue is scattershot. His problems must be more lucid and profound. Trump is incorrect to claim that Harris may attempt to stop fracking “on time one.” That’s crazy. Presidents ca n’t end fracking without a major regulatory effort, and that takes years.  ,
I have no idea whether Harris has the willpower or desire to stop fuel. I’m not the first to criticize Trump for having more organized language. If he can accomplish that, Pennsylvania is his.  ,
