The national news media instead chooses to focus on anyone else who tries because they ca n’t even be bothered to watch Kamala Harris ‘ campaign because they’re trying to help her win.
That’s why more than honestly look into Kamala’s fairly new factual declare that she once slung Happy Meals working at a McDonald’s, The Washington Post’s most wilful obtuse writer, Philip Bump, decided that this week his energy was best spent belittling anyone who questions it — most importantly, Kamala’s opponent, Donald Trump.
Since Trump has been criticizing the McDonald’s history, Bump wrote on Thursday, adding that” a lot of his followers are also pressing the issue, rushing to demonstrate that Harris was dishonest about her McDonald’s work using the same method of inquiry that they used to find out about voter fraud and animal eating.”
Kamala’s claim that he could n’t prove whether the “french fries and ice cream” tale was true even if he wanted to prove it to make herself seem humble and relatable was the only way Bump had any interest in it. ” Over the course of this week”, he wrote,” I spent some time looking into the story myself — not because I doubted Harris’s claim ( since there’s no real reason to doubt it ) but because I was curious , if , it was provable”.
When a Republican or a left-leaning news outlet raises a genuine problem that might be socially offensive to Democratic Party voters, the national media does this. By arguing and contesting its merits, they categorize the discussion as a partisan-driven affair with no impact or other forms of run-in with Democrats.
It’s what the internet did with the animal-snatching Haitian migrants history. The internet busted themselves by asking local government officials if they could show what Springfield, Ohio residents had to say about the documented says that relocated workers were eating animals and wild animals it. When the internet received the response they sought, there was no evidence, and they washed their hands and rang whoever was also debating.
It’s what the internet did with the international bribery scheme Hunter Biden used. Every advancement of that account, no matter how shocking, has been brushed away and regarded as a non-event by the internet. More than anyone else, Trump leaned into that especially severe square of media social bankruptcy. Parliamentary investigations, testimony under oath, and supporting reports increasingly show that President Biden’s degrade middle-aged child has for years been receiving money from foreign companies worth hundreds of millions of dollars, with only immediate access to the U.S. government, including his father. What’s more, there’s encouraging evidence that Joe Biden was a key person in the relations, an statement made by one of Hunter Biden’s years-long business associates.
Asked last year to find a balance between the unquestionable fact that there is at least an intriguing chance of vulgar corruption implicating the sitting president of the United States and the lack of interest from the commercial media, Bump yawned.
A few of Bump’s comments from that meeting with blogger Harold Dworman are included below.
” You have no proof that Joe Biden acted on Hunter Biden’s representative, or that Joe Biden took funds”!
” Get me information! There is none”!
You have not provided any proof beyond your analysis.
” This dialogue is foolish”!
” This is why I keep saying it’s dumb”!
To be good to Bump, he did mention this week in his row that he had the opportunity to visit up two Kamala McDonald’s sites in exchange for the work. He repeatedly tried to call the corporate workplace, but he never received a call. That requires at least a couple calories of effort, but he claimed that the exercise was consistently silly because — , also, who cares?
” Harris, unlike Trump”, he wrote, “has earned the benefit of the doubt on claims that may not be immediately demonstrable”.
In the same way, Bump was done with questioning Kamala’s repeated claims in her campaign angle to voters. Because he is aware that doing so will cause trouble for the social group he’s attempting to win this vote, he is prepared to get past.
