In the final months of the presidential campaign, it may come as no surprise that voters are being unsure which candidate has more faith in the economy.
Advertisement
According to The Hill,” Vice President Harris is gaining steam among voters regarding the economy, just as it is displaying fresh signs of strength.” According to many unique polls,” the market is the major issue for voters.” In a survey earlier this month, polling firm Ipsos rated it as” the single most important matter to Americans since April 2024.” Trump has a long history of dominance, initially over President Biden and then Harris when it comes to the business. But that prospect is then getting smaller”.
According to the content, Harris just trails Trump by three points among adults in terms of how the economy should be handled.  ,
Also The Hill seems perplexed by this.
Although it’s not totally clear why the gap is closing, one reason is possible that Harris will take over as the Democratic nominee.
Harris has shown to be a stronger courier than Biden on a number of problems and has energized Democrats and independents in a way that the current leader did no. However, both Biden and Harris would be tied to their president’s report on the economy.
Harris was commonly viewed as defeating Trump in her argument against the ex-president earlier this year, despite the fact that Biden struggled in his July conversation with Trump, which ultimately led to him being forced out of the competition.
Advertisement
Ask yourself what has changed in the last few months to give Harris more acceptance for financial issues. People on the left criticize her economic plans because they are so bad and do n’t seem to be taking Trump’s ideas and trying to pass them off as her own ( like no tax on tips ).  ,
For instance, her proposed federal restrictions on “price-gouging” was blasted by democratic Washington Post columnist Catherine Rampell.
” It’s difficult to exaggerate how bad this plan is”, Rampell wrote , next month. ” It is, in all but name, a broad set of government-enforced price controls across every business, not only food. Costs and income levels may no longer be determined by supply and demand. Far-off Washington officials do. The FTC would be able to specify the appropriate value that a Kroger in Ohio may cost for milk.
Perhaps an analyst for Obama disapproved of the program.
Jason Furman, the former head of the National Economic Council under Obama, told the New York Times,” This is not practical plan, and I think the biggest desire is that it ends up being a lot of speech and no reality.” ” There’s no back here, and there is some downside”.
However, the costs of resources and necessities are still too great. This is something actually Harris admits in her tree statements, while pretending she’s never the sitting vice president.
Advertisement
What has transpired to clarify why Harris would be able to shut the economic confidence gap.
She probably did n’t actually do that, which is the likely explanation. The fact that this is hardly the first time we’ve heard that Kamala Harris has closed the economic gap with Trump did n’t reflect reality is the easiest way to demonstrate this. In fact, the consensus from next month was that Harris had outperformed Trump on this crucial topic.  ,
After a fresh surveys revealed more Americans believe Kamala Harris with the business, Newsweek reported in mid-August that” Donald Trump’s chances of winning the election in November seem “bleak”
According to the Financial Times and the University of Michigan Ross School of Business, 42 % of Americans favored Kamala Harris to lead the economy, barely exceeding Trump’s 41 %. That poll made no sense and clearly did n’t reflect reality. I did n’t believe it then, and countless polls since showed this clearly was n’t the case.
The internet is simply counting on everyone to fall for it once more.