While there is a classic part to elegance, such as in traditional craft or Roman sculptures, there is also a dispositional component. This helps to understand the causes of the historical “it” woman or man of any given moment and accounts for the variation in personal tastes. It explains why someone like Kim Kardashian could have only experienced her most memorable moment in the first 2010s when the society’s obsession with appearance had reached its pinnacle of social concentration.  ,
Though he is large with piercing blue eyes, J. D. Vance is n’t particularly popular. His physical hair masks a soft chin, which conceals the occasional variation of a few extra weight. After the Oct. 1 vice presidential debate, the young woman market gave him a lot of positive feedback.
This reaction comes at a time when the left has been particularly hostile toward pale men, which the Democrat Party is somewhat struggling with as it makes various attempts to reach out to this specific demographic. It’s a sign that maybe we’ve hit another instant of ethnic saturation.
The conversation was an intriguing contrast between two different emotions of white manhood: strong, confident, and composed Vance juxtaposed with Walz, who referred to himself as merely an “old man” and a “knucklehead” and is proud of his self-portrait as a moderate, small-town instructor. The Democrats ‘ cherished group of young white male citizens finds the latter to be hollow.  ,
It’s only natural that defiant strength has more appeal than self-deprecation, the latter of which Vance showed in abundance at this time, when nuclear war is on the horizon for the first time in decades and economic uncertainty is looming large. Republicans have historically been an especially difficult group of young women, but a regular expression of manhood seems to be what we need in this uncertain period of historical and social uncertainty. We are no longer reacting when social issues are at the vanguard of our discussions and are fueled by trivial internationalist problems. Instead, we are consumed by stuff concerns about food value, the migrant crisis, children work, and a future for the nation.  ,
At the debate, Vance demonstrated verbal dexterity and calm steadfastness. This helped him navigate the CBS moderators, especially during a particularly noteworthy and inappropriate interjection involving a fake “fact check.” Vendredo informed the moderators that “fact checks” were in contravention of the agreed-upon debate rules, and they corrected them in their Democratic-inspired interpretation of the legal status of the Haitian migrants occupying Springfield, Ohio. Vance’s rebuttal was not excitable but firm, eventually triggering the moderators to cut his microphone. After the last four years of government by a regime with a senescent, frequently unintelligible, figurehead and unclear messaging, it is precisely this unwavering demonstration of moral and factual dominance that satisfies voters ‘ thirst.  ,
This exchange also mirrored a men and women’s relationship that is all too common. Women subconsciously assess the strength of their male partners by creating boundary tests, so they can feel the acceptable edges of what a man will tolerate before establishing a boundary and how he acts in it. Vance not only successfully pushed this boundary, but also struck a unique balance between politeness and dominance. Women witnessing this exchange internalized that Vance is capable of leadership, and if this were a one-to-one relational test, he would pass.
While there was some predictable outcry about “mansplaining”, the word felt more like an anachronism, a tired and lazy woke phrase that belonged in the Obama years. More women appeared to express gratitude for a man who can intellectually unburden us so that we can relax into roles that feminism has made us forget how enjoyable they were.  ,
Vance treated Walz surprisingly humanely in his manner despite clearly being more skilled on the debate stage, despite the fact that leftist media incorrectly portrayed him as” creepy” and “weird” just weeks ago. He nodded sympathetically when necessary, which served as a rhetorical strategy to foster a sense of political cohesion and likeability, and he was not afraid to concur with his opponent.  ,
Women are cognitively reducing Vance’s ability to be strong and decisive as well as benevolent and reasonable. The ideal expression of masculinity is a man who combines all the characteristics to create the political hero who rescues a puppy from a burning building. It blocks the activation of female neurons entirely.  ,
The vice presidential candidate has an internal strength unique to politics and a remarkable ability to combine his Yale Law background with his compassionate understanding of the issues facing real people, as well as his notoriously troubled upbringing in working-class Appalachia, well documented in his memoir, Hillbilly Elegy.
In many ways, this makes him ideal for Donald Trump, a fellow establishment outsider, and also light on the eyes.