” I have a Glock”, Kamala Harris told CBS’s “60 Minutes” system on Sunday. And the cannon world suddenly burst forth with a great laugh that sounded strangely like , the longer version of BS, as you heard in reply.
Advertisement
The “60 Minutes” meeting was part of the Democrat political candidate’s efforts to portray a more serious voice, between the sex audio and” The Watch” looks, that is. As Matt information, the meeting was a crisis for a variety of reasons.  ,
The weapon issue is on another level completely.
When you ask a New York City apartment dweller what kind of vehicle he drives, you’d expect a New York writer to ask for a respectable follow-up about a specific weapons. But Bill Whitaker tried, love his soul.  ,
” Have you ever fired it”? Whitaker asked.  ,
” Yes. Of program. Ha-ha-ha”, said Harris, claiming she’d gone to a collection.  ,
Give the city slicker some credit, even though any gunman would have inquired about the type of Glock you individual. At least Whitaker inquired about whether or not she had ever fired it.  ,
But the problem is, as attorney general of California, Kamala Harris declared the very weapons that the 2024 type of Kamala Harris says she owns “unsafe” . ,
Cue the document damage.
Gun rights lawyer Kostas Moros stated to PJ Media:” Kamala has historically opposed the right to possess firearms. It’s a turnaround that is naturally phony”.
Connected:  , But Kamala Has a Gun, Does She?
The California Rifle &, Pistol Association, a leading advocate for firearm right in California, Moros questioned on X:” She supported the Unsafe Handgun Act and expanded it so that microstamping began to be enforced in 2013″ So why does she individual an’ illegal handgun'”?
Advertisement
Oof.
Moros explained that as California attorney general in 2013, Harris classified all Glocks as” ‘ illegal weapons’ because they do not include a cooperative room weight indicator]CLI], lack a magazine disconnect mechanism]MDM], and until our lawsuit caused California to overturn the necessity, of course lacked microstamping” . ,
Harris issued rules requiring the novel and bespoke “microstamping” technology on mass-produced guns to imprint a “microscopic array of characters that identify the make, model, and serial number of the pistol”, Moros explains.  ,
As a “law enforcement” officer, Kamala should know that criminals do n’t go through legal means to get guns. They would likely pick up their brass if they had a gun they could legally own and commit a crime. Or, as Moros explains,” they could replace the firing pin with another. Or, alternatively, they could just use a revolver for their crimes”.
California’s and Kamala’s efforts to make it as hard as possible to purchase and/or conceal guns make her sudden gun switcheroo much harder to stomach. Nobody believes her new stance, as I explained in my piece,” Kamala’s Ghost Gun“. And it’s especially upsetting to hear her recounting her gun history to those who have fought alongside her in the trenches.
According to Moros, Harris’s claims as the attorney general of California are the cause of Californians ‘ inability to purchase contemporary semiautomatic handguns that were created after 2013. Even worse, he claims,” Her ban will continue until 2023 when a recent lawsuit brought by my colleagues representing the California Rifle &, Pistol Association won a preliminary injunction against the law in question.”
Advertisement
Harris has accomplished more than most to elude the rights to self-defense that are given to people by God. California’s onerous gun-roster restrictions were thrown out in court, largely thanks to the California Rifle &, Pistol Association’s hard work.  ,
Kamala probably meant this… pic. twitter.com/EkSoHjj5uv— KrimsonNews ( @KrimsonNews ) October 8, 2024
Moros advises that if anyone has another chance to question Harris about her gun before the election, they should include the following:
- Do you support your actions as the state’s attorney general, which effectively ended the prohibition on the sale of modern handguns there for a decade before the law was declared constitutional last year?
- If so, how do you reconcile that with your most recent statements that appear to indicate that you do not oppose the ownership of handguns?  ,
- Finally, as to any handguns you own, are they on the California roster, or do you own a handgun California law declares “unsafe”? If the latter, did you purchase it with a tax exemption that is not available to regular citizens?  ,
Touché.