With Election Day just around the corner, some liberals are raising the alarm about a alleged shortage of Christian support for the election campaign.
According to a study released on Monday by Arizona Christian University’s Cultural Research Center, “32 million self-identifiable Christians who regularly attend church wo n’t cast their ballots among those who are unlikely to cast their ballots in this upcoming election.” These Christians are dissatisfied with” all of the major candidates” and are among the reasons why they are n’t participating in civic life in November.
The impact, if those projections are even remotely accurate, “produces a negative impression on President Trump’s chances of winning” than on Mrs. Harris ‘ effort to succeed Joe Biden,” the study concluded.
With so much on the line in November, Christian companies are attempting to entice religious voters to cast ballots in November. However, one organization is focusing on obtaining the votes of several different denominations, which may determine which candidate wins the White House.
Catholics for Catholics ( CforC ) is a 501 ( c ) ( 4 ) organization focused on Catholic voter turnout in seven swing states: Arizona, Georgia, Michigan, Nevada, North Carolina, Pennsylvania, and Wisconsin. There are an estimated 19 million people who “attend a Catholic religion,” according to the ACU research, and they are unlikely to cast ballot this year.
CforC President John Yep reported to The Federalist that it is those sorts of low-propensity Catholic electors who the organization is attempting to win ahead of Election Day.
” It’s two groups of people that are going to really help swing this election ,]with ] number one]being ] Catholic voters in swing states”, Yep said.
The Gameplan
The CforC ballot-chasing initiative was officially launched in June, but first creation for the programme began in January.
Turning Point Action ( TPA ), which launched its ballot-chase initiative earlier this year, approached the organization, according to Yep, to help with efforts to target and draw in low-propensity Catholic voters during the 2024 election season. The two liberal institutions have a data-sharing agreement in place that allows CforC to use the voter data collected by Turning Point under their working partnership.
As The Federalist recently reported, TPA’s” Chase the Ballot” employs” the most recent voting move information acquired from local and state governments”. The data group of the organization later used this data to create custom wards and districts” containing hundreds of… potential electors” in these areas.
Another liberal activist groups have tended to change their tactics a little and concentrate more on concentrated voter outreach in the 2024 cycle, Yep said. ” To that end, approaches were developed by various organizations with more of the same goal of going ] after low-propensity Republican voters,” he said.
The CforC leader believes there are roughly 2.2 million low-propensity Christian voters in the preceding swing states. The team has about 1, 000 participants working to record and turn out at least 12, 000 like votes in Arizona, 4, 000 in Georgia, 30, 000 in Michigan, 9, 000 in Nevada, 15, 000 in North Carolina, 23, 000 in Pennsylvania, and 15, 000 in Wisconsin.
How It Works
Similar to TPA’s plan, CforC’s activity areas a heavy emphasis on vote runners forming personal relationships with potential voters in their local neighborhoods.
After Catholics for Catholics vote runners register online and go through the necessary screening process, they are given access to an online site and a list of 20 low-propensity Christian citizens in their area, according to Yep. The online program offers chasers “information tools” like scripts for scripting scripts to use when calling, chatting, or visiting these voters ‘ homes, as well as a resource site where CforC volunteers can stay in touch with one another.
According to the CforC president, each low-propensity voter profile in the online portal includes a list of five action items that each candidate had full before Election Day. He claimed that the ultimate goal is to ensure that these people are registered and eligible to cast their ballots in the poll.
” Get Arizona, for example. If you register in Arizona and you ask for a mail-in the vote, that’s public information. When you ]request it], get it, and returning it, Maricopa County changes it for public record, so we’re able to work with that and hear which votes” are still out there, Yep said. The system is” synced that once their ballots have been turned in, that’s when]CforC chasers ] know that]they’ve ] completed the mission”.
Once they’ve finished their initial list, he added, they can ask for an extra 20 low-propensity Christian voters to pursue.
Democrats and Republicans have one advantage when it comes to vote hunting: the fact that some Democrat voters are concentrated and concentrated in densely populated urban areas, while Republican people are more prevalent in exurbs and rural areas, where citizens are more evenly distributed. When questioned on how the Catholics for Catholics organization makes up for this risk, Yep cited the organization’s rely on the “parish base” and its approach to assigning runners to potential citizens in their areas.
” We often ask people,’ What district are you at?’ and attribute them 20 citizens near” their place, he said. ” In that sense, it’s not like they’re method out there because that woman’s going to proceed after]that vote ] in their area”.
Sure noted that it’s a “relatively small budget,” but declined to disclose how much money CforC is spending on its ballot-gathering operation.
The Road Away
CforC’s work have not come without its challenges, yet. Sure claimed that the biggest challenge facing the organization so far has been a lacked understanding of the electorate’s “what’s at stake in 2024.”
It’s been a challenge “overcoming]the sentiment ] that both sides have issues, they’re OK, and therefore, we do n’t need to get out there and vote or take action”, Yep said.
The CforC chairman expressed confidence in the organization’s ability to handle these problems while highlighting the concerns of voters regarding the assassination attempt against former president Donald Trump.
” I think when people see two assassination attempts on the president ,]they know ] something is not right”, he added.
[READ NEXT: Is Christian Nonprofit Voter Outreach the Best Way to defeat the Democratic Party’s Election Machine ]
For more vote information and updates, visit , electionbriefing.com.
The Federalist employees author Shawn Fleetwood graduated from the University of Mary Washington. He previously served as a condition content writer for Agreement of States Action and his work has been featured in various stores, including RealClearPolitics, RealClear Health, and Conservative Review. Following him on Twitter @ShawnFleetwood